{"title":"Comparison of intra-articular morphine and bupivacaine following knee arthroscopy.","authors":"S A VanNess, M E Gittins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A prospective study was conducted to investigate and compare the analgesic effect of morphine and bupivacaine injected intra-articularly following elective knee arthroscopy performed under general anesthesia without the use of a tourniquet. Cost-effectiveness of these agents was also evaluated. Patients in Group 1 (n = 41) received 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; while Group 2 (n = 40) received 2 mg morphine (1 mg/cc) in 28 cc normal saline (total volume 30 cc). Postoperative pain scores and the amount of supplemental analgesic agents used in a 24-hour period were recorded. Results showed that patients in Group 2 reported significantly less pain overall (P < .006) and significantly lower analgesic requirements (P < .0004) at a lower average patient cost than Group 1. We conclude that intra-articular morphine reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements more effectively and at a lower average patient cost than bupivacaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":19637,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic review","volume":"23 9","pages":"743-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A prospective study was conducted to investigate and compare the analgesic effect of morphine and bupivacaine injected intra-articularly following elective knee arthroscopy performed under general anesthesia without the use of a tourniquet. Cost-effectiveness of these agents was also evaluated. Patients in Group 1 (n = 41) received 30 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; while Group 2 (n = 40) received 2 mg morphine (1 mg/cc) in 28 cc normal saline (total volume 30 cc). Postoperative pain scores and the amount of supplemental analgesic agents used in a 24-hour period were recorded. Results showed that patients in Group 2 reported significantly less pain overall (P < .006) and significantly lower analgesic requirements (P < .0004) at a lower average patient cost than Group 1. We conclude that intra-articular morphine reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirements more effectively and at a lower average patient cost than bupivacaine.