Women in the formaldehyde industry: their exposures and their jobs.

P A Stewart, A Blair
{"title":"Women in the formaldehyde industry: their exposures and their jobs.","authors":"P A Stewart,&nbsp;A Blair","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies have examined disease risks for women separately from risks for men, but few have examined exposure differences. This report used data from an epidemiological study of formaldehyde workers to compare formaldehyde exposures between men and women. Exposures were estimated from historical monitoring results, walk-through workplace surveys, interviews with long-term workers, and reviews of historical records. The mean of the exposures in the first job, the last job, and the highest exposed job were calculated by gender. Differences were found when all subjects were included in the analysis (men having higher exposures, on average, than women), but when nonexposed subjects were removed (40% of women, 6% of men), differences were minor. There was a substantial difference in the estimated peak exposure between men and women that decreased, but remained, when only exposed subjects were included. Evaluation of exposures in 1940 to 1945, 1965, and 1979 found that women had a higher average exposure than men in 1940 to 1945, but this pattern was reversed in 1965. By 1979, the average difference between the two genders had disappeared. A comparison of cumulative exposure found that exposed women had half the total exposure of exposed men. More men than women were exposed to other chemicals. Women tended to predominate in clerical, laboratory, assembly, finishing, inspecting, packing, and shipping jobs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association","volume":"36 8","pages":"918-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have examined disease risks for women separately from risks for men, but few have examined exposure differences. This report used data from an epidemiological study of formaldehyde workers to compare formaldehyde exposures between men and women. Exposures were estimated from historical monitoring results, walk-through workplace surveys, interviews with long-term workers, and reviews of historical records. The mean of the exposures in the first job, the last job, and the highest exposed job were calculated by gender. Differences were found when all subjects were included in the analysis (men having higher exposures, on average, than women), but when nonexposed subjects were removed (40% of women, 6% of men), differences were minor. There was a substantial difference in the estimated peak exposure between men and women that decreased, but remained, when only exposed subjects were included. Evaluation of exposures in 1940 to 1945, 1965, and 1979 found that women had a higher average exposure than men in 1940 to 1945, but this pattern was reversed in 1965. By 1979, the average difference between the two genders had disappeared. A comparison of cumulative exposure found that exposed women had half the total exposure of exposed men. More men than women were exposed to other chemicals. Women tended to predominate in clerical, laboratory, assembly, finishing, inspecting, packing, and shipping jobs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲醛行业的女性:她们的暴露和她们的工作。
有几项研究将女性的疾病风险与男性的风险分开进行了调查,但很少有研究考察了暴露程度的差异。本报告使用来自甲醛工人的流行病学研究的数据来比较男性和女性的甲醛暴露。根据历史监测结果、实地工作场所调查、对长期工人的访谈和对历史记录的回顾,估计暴露程度。第一份工作、最后一份工作和最高暴露量的平均值按性别计算。当所有的研究对象都被纳入分析(男性的平均暴露量高于女性)时,发现了差异,但当没有暴露的研究对象被删除时(40%的女性,6%的男性),差异很小。当仅包括暴露的受试者时,男性和女性之间估计的峰值暴露的显著差异有所减少,但仍然存在。对1940年至1945年、1965年和1979年暴露量的评估发现,在1940年至1945年期间,女性的平均暴露量高于男性,但这种模式在1965年发生了逆转。到1979年,两性之间的平均差异已经消失。一项对累积暴露量的比较发现,暴露于核辐射的女性的总暴露量是暴露于核辐射的男性的一半。接触其他化学物质的男性多于女性。妇女往往在文书、实验室、装配、整理、检查、包装和运输工作中占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Re: B-scan ultrasonic measurement of the lumbar spine canal as a predictor of industrial low back pain complaints and extended work loss, by M Battié et al. Re: Successful treatment of life-threatening proprionitrile exposure with sodium nitrite/sodium thiosulfate followed by hyperbaric oxygen, by Scolnick et al. Elevated dioxin blood levels in British chemical workers. Surgical gloves and hypersensitivity to latex. Sleep and alertness in a 12-hour rotating shift work environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1