Efficacy of sliding-scale insulin therapy: a comparison with prospective regimens.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1994-12-01
J G Gearhart, J L Duncan, W H Replogle, R C Forbes, E J Walley
{"title":"Efficacy of sliding-scale insulin therapy: a comparison with prospective regimens.","authors":"J G Gearhart,&nbsp;J L Duncan,&nbsp;W H Replogle,&nbsp;R C Forbes,&nbsp;E J Walley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of retroactive sliding-scale insulin therapy, proactive therapy, and a combination of the two methods in establishing glycemic control in hospitalized diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 47 diabetic ketoacidosis inpatients were reviewed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sliding-scale insulin therapy group's glucose deviation score (167.4) was significantly higher than the deviation for the proactive (112.9) and combination (121.3) groups. The sliding-scale insulin therapy group also had a significantly higher median glucose value (262.5) than the proactive (199.9) and combination (221.2) groups as well as a significantly higher number of nursing shifts (0.70) in which a glucose of 250 mg/dl or greater was recorded than in the proactive (0.37) and combination (0.40) groups. The proactive group was on their treatment regimen significantly less time than the combination group (5.5 vs 10.4 nursing shifts, respectively). The proactive group was hospitalized significantly fewer days (4.4) than the combination (6.3) and sliding-scale insulin therapy (6.3) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study lends support to previous concerns that sliding-scale insulin therapy is less effective than preventive therapy in the management of hospitalized diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"14 4","pages":"313-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of retroactive sliding-scale insulin therapy, proactive therapy, and a combination of the two methods in establishing glycemic control in hospitalized diabetic patients.

Methods: Medical records of 47 diabetic ketoacidosis inpatients were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: The sliding-scale insulin therapy group's glucose deviation score (167.4) was significantly higher than the deviation for the proactive (112.9) and combination (121.3) groups. The sliding-scale insulin therapy group also had a significantly higher median glucose value (262.5) than the proactive (199.9) and combination (221.2) groups as well as a significantly higher number of nursing shifts (0.70) in which a glucose of 250 mg/dl or greater was recorded than in the proactive (0.37) and combination (0.40) groups. The proactive group was on their treatment regimen significantly less time than the combination group (5.5 vs 10.4 nursing shifts, respectively). The proactive group was hospitalized significantly fewer days (4.4) than the combination (6.3) and sliding-scale insulin therapy (6.3) groups.

Conclusions: The present study lends support to previous concerns that sliding-scale insulin therapy is less effective than preventive therapy in the management of hospitalized diabetic patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
滑动刻度胰岛素治疗的疗效:与前瞻性方案的比较。
目的:比较回顾性滑动秤胰岛素治疗、主动胰岛素治疗及两者联合治疗对糖尿病住院患者血糖控制的效果。方法:回顾性分析47例糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院患者的病历。结果:滑动量表胰岛素治疗组血糖偏差评分(167.4)明显高于主动治疗组(112.9)和联合治疗组(121.3)。滑动刻度胰岛素治疗组的中位血糖值(262.5)也明显高于主动治疗组(199.9)和联合治疗组(221.2),并且记录的血糖为250 mg/dl或更高的护理班次(0.70)也明显高于主动治疗组(0.37)和联合治疗组(0.40)。主动组在治疗方案上的时间明显少于联合组(分别为5.5 vs 10.4护理班次)。主动组住院天数(4.4天)明显少于联合组(6.3天)和滑动刻度胰岛素治疗组(6.3天)。结论:本研究支持了先前的担忧,即在糖尿病住院患者的管理中,滑动刻度胰岛素治疗不如预防性治疗有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of survey research. Desirable features of qualitative research. Consideration of venue and vehicle in health behavior research with adolescents. Reliability of survey about immunization barriers in Minnesota. Should primary care physicians take care of diabetes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1