J G Gearhart, J L Duncan, W H Replogle, R C Forbes, E J Walley
{"title":"Efficacy of sliding-scale insulin therapy: a comparison with prospective regimens.","authors":"J G Gearhart, J L Duncan, W H Replogle, R C Forbes, E J Walley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of retroactive sliding-scale insulin therapy, proactive therapy, and a combination of the two methods in establishing glycemic control in hospitalized diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 47 diabetic ketoacidosis inpatients were reviewed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sliding-scale insulin therapy group's glucose deviation score (167.4) was significantly higher than the deviation for the proactive (112.9) and combination (121.3) groups. The sliding-scale insulin therapy group also had a significantly higher median glucose value (262.5) than the proactive (199.9) and combination (221.2) groups as well as a significantly higher number of nursing shifts (0.70) in which a glucose of 250 mg/dl or greater was recorded than in the proactive (0.37) and combination (0.40) groups. The proactive group was on their treatment regimen significantly less time than the combination group (5.5 vs 10.4 nursing shifts, respectively). The proactive group was hospitalized significantly fewer days (4.4) than the combination (6.3) and sliding-scale insulin therapy (6.3) groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study lends support to previous concerns that sliding-scale insulin therapy is less effective than preventive therapy in the management of hospitalized diabetic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"14 4","pages":"313-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of retroactive sliding-scale insulin therapy, proactive therapy, and a combination of the two methods in establishing glycemic control in hospitalized diabetic patients.
Methods: Medical records of 47 diabetic ketoacidosis inpatients were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: The sliding-scale insulin therapy group's glucose deviation score (167.4) was significantly higher than the deviation for the proactive (112.9) and combination (121.3) groups. The sliding-scale insulin therapy group also had a significantly higher median glucose value (262.5) than the proactive (199.9) and combination (221.2) groups as well as a significantly higher number of nursing shifts (0.70) in which a glucose of 250 mg/dl or greater was recorded than in the proactive (0.37) and combination (0.40) groups. The proactive group was on their treatment regimen significantly less time than the combination group (5.5 vs 10.4 nursing shifts, respectively). The proactive group was hospitalized significantly fewer days (4.4) than the combination (6.3) and sliding-scale insulin therapy (6.3) groups.
Conclusions: The present study lends support to previous concerns that sliding-scale insulin therapy is less effective than preventive therapy in the management of hospitalized diabetic patients.
目的:比较回顾性滑动秤胰岛素治疗、主动胰岛素治疗及两者联合治疗对糖尿病住院患者血糖控制的效果。方法:回顾性分析47例糖尿病酮症酸中毒住院患者的病历。结果:滑动量表胰岛素治疗组血糖偏差评分(167.4)明显高于主动治疗组(112.9)和联合治疗组(121.3)。滑动刻度胰岛素治疗组的中位血糖值(262.5)也明显高于主动治疗组(199.9)和联合治疗组(221.2),并且记录的血糖为250 mg/dl或更高的护理班次(0.70)也明显高于主动治疗组(0.37)和联合治疗组(0.40)。主动组在治疗方案上的时间明显少于联合组(分别为5.5 vs 10.4护理班次)。主动组住院天数(4.4天)明显少于联合组(6.3天)和滑动刻度胰岛素治疗组(6.3天)。结论:本研究支持了先前的担忧,即在糖尿病住院患者的管理中,滑动刻度胰岛素治疗不如预防性治疗有效。