[The effects of ketamine, propofol and nitrous oxide on visual evoked potential during fentanyl anesthesia].

W Y Hou, W Y Lee, S M Lin, C C Liu, L Susceto, W Z Sun, S Y Lin
{"title":"[The effects of ketamine, propofol and nitrous oxide on visual evoked potential during fentanyl anesthesia].","authors":"W Y Hou,&nbsp;W Y Lee,&nbsp;S M Lin,&nbsp;C C Liu,&nbsp;L Susceto,&nbsp;W Z Sun,&nbsp;S Y Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the effects of ketamine, N2O, propofol on visual evoked potential (VEP) during fentanyl anesthesia, 14 patients undergoing transphenoid pituitary dissections were studied. Visual stimulation was done by using the goggles with red light diodes through closed eyelids and responses were recorded in one channel montage, Cz against Oz. The stimulus frequency was 1.9 flashes/sec. The VEPs were recorded from skin incision until the opening of the dura. For comparison, the preanesthesia to anesthesia values were determined. The ratio for N2 (N75) latency were 100.5 +/- 13.9% in ketamine group, 104 +/- 3.5% in N2O group, 100.5 +/- 4.2% in propofol group. The ratios for P2 (P100) latency were 97.45 +/- 5.7% in ketamine group, 101.9 +/- 3.5% in N2O group, 96.8 +/- 5.5% in propofol group. For N2P2 amplitude, the ratios were 36.3% +/- 31.4% in ketamine group, 138.5 +/- 58.0% in N2O group, 80.8 +/- 42.2% in propofol group. The percentage of inadequate recordings were 2.5 +/- 4.3% in ketamine group, 19.2 +/- 2.2% in N2O group and 20.6 +/- 16.0% in propofol group. The percentage of false positive results were 0 +/- 0% in ketamine group, 9.8 +/- 19.9% in N2O group, 12.7 +/- 13.2% in propofol group. Satisfactory anesthesia was achieved in all groups except for ketamine group which required additional medications for elevated blood pressure and intracranial pressure, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. It is concluded that there was great variability of VEP during anesthesia and surgery. Amplitude rather than latency changes were observed during anesthesia combined with fentanyl.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77247,"journal":{"name":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of ketamine, N2O, propofol on visual evoked potential (VEP) during fentanyl anesthesia, 14 patients undergoing transphenoid pituitary dissections were studied. Visual stimulation was done by using the goggles with red light diodes through closed eyelids and responses were recorded in one channel montage, Cz against Oz. The stimulus frequency was 1.9 flashes/sec. The VEPs were recorded from skin incision until the opening of the dura. For comparison, the preanesthesia to anesthesia values were determined. The ratio for N2 (N75) latency were 100.5 +/- 13.9% in ketamine group, 104 +/- 3.5% in N2O group, 100.5 +/- 4.2% in propofol group. The ratios for P2 (P100) latency were 97.45 +/- 5.7% in ketamine group, 101.9 +/- 3.5% in N2O group, 96.8 +/- 5.5% in propofol group. For N2P2 amplitude, the ratios were 36.3% +/- 31.4% in ketamine group, 138.5 +/- 58.0% in N2O group, 80.8 +/- 42.2% in propofol group. The percentage of inadequate recordings were 2.5 +/- 4.3% in ketamine group, 19.2 +/- 2.2% in N2O group and 20.6 +/- 16.0% in propofol group. The percentage of false positive results were 0 +/- 0% in ketamine group, 9.8 +/- 19.9% in N2O group, 12.7 +/- 13.2% in propofol group. Satisfactory anesthesia was achieved in all groups except for ketamine group which required additional medications for elevated blood pressure and intracranial pressure, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. It is concluded that there was great variability of VEP during anesthesia and surgery. Amplitude rather than latency changes were observed during anesthesia combined with fentanyl.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氯胺酮、异丙酚和氧化亚氮对芬太尼麻醉中视觉诱发电位的影响。
为了评价氯胺酮、N2O、异丙酚对芬太尼麻醉下视觉诱发电位(VEP)的影响,对14例经蝶腺垂体切除术患者进行了研究。通过闭上眼睑使用带有红光二极管的护目镜进行视觉刺激,并以一通道蒙太奇(Cz对Oz)记录反应,刺激频率为1.9次/秒。记录从皮肤切开至硬脑膜打开的vep。为了比较,测定麻醉前与麻醉值。氯胺酮组N2 (N75)潜伏期比为100.5 +/- 13.9%,N2O组为104 +/- 3.5%,异丙酚组为100.5 +/- 4.2%。氯胺酮组P2 (P100)潜伏期为97.45 +/- 5.7%,N2O组为101.9 +/- 3.5%,异丙酚组为96.8 +/- 5.5%。对于N2P2振幅,氯胺酮组为36.3% +/- 31.4%,N2O组为138.5 +/- 58.0%,异丙酚组为80.8 +/- 42.2%。氯胺酮组记录不全率为2.5 +/- 4.3%,N2O组为19.2 +/- 2.2%,异丙酚组为20.6 +/- 16.0%。氯胺酮组假阳性率为0 +/- 0%,N2O组为9.8 +/- 19.9%,异丙酚组为12.7 +/- 13.2%。除氯胺酮组因血压和颅内压升高、术后恶心和呕吐需要额外用药外,所有组麻醉效果满意。综上所述,麻醉和手术期间VEP有很大的变异性。在芬太尼联合麻醉时,观察到幅度变化而不是潜伏期变化。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged fasting in pediatric outpatients does not cause hypoglycemia. Continuous succinylcholine infusion and phase II block in short surgical procedures. [Pheochromocytoma]. [Anesthetic management of intraoperatively diagnosed pheochromocytoma--a case report]. [Postoperative hypoglycemia after pheochromocytoma resection].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1