Allergen and protein content of latex gloves.

Annals of allergy Pub Date : 1994-10-01
H Alenius, S Mäkinen-Kiljunen, K Turjanmaa, T Palosuo, T Reunala
{"title":"Allergen and protein content of latex gloves.","authors":"H Alenius,&nbsp;S Mäkinen-Kiljunen,&nbsp;K Turjanmaa,&nbsp;T Palosuo,&nbsp;T Reunala","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proteins eluting from surgical gloves and other medical rubber products elicit immediate local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions in latex-allergic subjects but detailed knowledge about the amount and allergenic potential of these proteins is scanty.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To protect latex-allergic people and to diminish the risk of sensitization, adequate methods are needed to measure and monitor the allergen content of surgical latex gloves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Extracts of six surgical and one household latex glove brand were studied. Bradford and Lowry methods were used for total protein measurements. Sera from 17 latex-allergic patients were used as a source of latex IgE antibodies. Allergen content of extracts was studied in vitro by immunoblot, crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis and immunospot methods, and in vivo by skin prick testing in 35 latex-allergic patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total protein concentration of the glove extracts varied from 3 to 337 micrograms/g glove. The Bradford method gave lower values than the Lowry method. Immunoblotting showed allergenic rubber proteins in four of the seven glove brands. Ten proteins in two surgical and six proteins in one household glove brand bound latex IgE antibodies in a heterogeneous manner. The results from crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis and immunospot assays were mostly in line with immunoblotting findings. Extracts from five of the seven glove brands elicited positive prick tests; in all five also the presence of allergens could be shown by in vitro tests. Prick test reactivity and total protein concentration were not directly correlated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In vitro assays showed considerable variation in the total protein and allergen contents of different latex glove brands. The amount of protein eluting from the gloves did not always correlate with their allergenicity in skin prick tests indicating that total protein measurement is not a sufficient method to monitor the allergenic properties of latex gloves.</p>","PeriodicalId":7931,"journal":{"name":"Annals of allergy","volume":"73 4","pages":"315-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proteins eluting from surgical gloves and other medical rubber products elicit immediate local and systemic hypersensitivity reactions in latex-allergic subjects but detailed knowledge about the amount and allergenic potential of these proteins is scanty.

Objective: To protect latex-allergic people and to diminish the risk of sensitization, adequate methods are needed to measure and monitor the allergen content of surgical latex gloves.

Methods: Extracts of six surgical and one household latex glove brand were studied. Bradford and Lowry methods were used for total protein measurements. Sera from 17 latex-allergic patients were used as a source of latex IgE antibodies. Allergen content of extracts was studied in vitro by immunoblot, crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis and immunospot methods, and in vivo by skin prick testing in 35 latex-allergic patients.

Results: The total protein concentration of the glove extracts varied from 3 to 337 micrograms/g glove. The Bradford method gave lower values than the Lowry method. Immunoblotting showed allergenic rubber proteins in four of the seven glove brands. Ten proteins in two surgical and six proteins in one household glove brand bound latex IgE antibodies in a heterogeneous manner. The results from crossed radioimmunoelectrophoresis and immunospot assays were mostly in line with immunoblotting findings. Extracts from five of the seven glove brands elicited positive prick tests; in all five also the presence of allergens could be shown by in vitro tests. Prick test reactivity and total protein concentration were not directly correlated.

Conclusions: In vitro assays showed considerable variation in the total protein and allergen contents of different latex glove brands. The amount of protein eluting from the gloves did not always correlate with their allergenicity in skin prick tests indicating that total protein measurement is not a sufficient method to monitor the allergenic properties of latex gloves.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳胶手套过敏原及蛋白质含量。
背景:从外科手套和其他医用橡胶制品中脱出的蛋白质在乳胶过敏受试者中引起立即的局部和全身超敏反应,但关于这些蛋白质的数量和致敏潜力的详细知识很少。目的:为保护乳胶过敏人群,降低致敏风险,需要适当的方法对医用乳胶手套的过敏原含量进行测量和监测。方法:对6个医用乳胶手套品牌和1个家用乳胶手套品牌的提取物进行研究。总蛋白测定采用Bradford和Lowry法。选取17例乳胶过敏患者的血清作为乳胶IgE抗体的来源。采用免疫印迹法、交叉放射免疫电泳法和免疫斑点法对35例乳胶过敏患者的提取物进行体外和体内的变应原含量测定。结果:总蛋白浓度在3 ~ 337微克/g手套之间变化。Bradford方法给出的值比Lowry方法低。免疫印迹显示七个手套品牌中有四个含有致敏橡胶蛋白。两种外科手术中的10种蛋白质和一种家用手套品牌中的6种蛋白质以异质方式结合乳胶IgE抗体。交叉放射免疫电泳和免疫斑点检测结果与免疫印迹检测结果基本一致。7个手套品牌中有5个品牌的提取物刺破测试呈阳性;在这五种情况下,过敏原的存在也可以通过体外试验显示出来。点刺试验反应性与总蛋白浓度无直接相关。结论:不同品牌乳胶手套的总蛋白和过敏原含量存在较大差异。在皮肤点刺试验中,从手套中洗脱的蛋白质量并不总是与它们的致敏性相关,这表明总蛋白质测量并不足以监测乳胶手套的致敏性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lyme disease. Familial cold urticaria. Allergic arthritis. Use of nasal cytology in the diagnosis of occult chronic sinusitis in asthmatic children. Comparison of budesonide and disodium cromoglycate for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1