Use of a closed-airway suctioning system during anesthesia.

R S Wu, C W Tao, S Y Wong, P P Tan
{"title":"Use of a closed-airway suctioning system during anesthesia.","authors":"R S Wu,&nbsp;C W Tao,&nbsp;S Y Wong,&nbsp;P P Tan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated the efficacy of a closed airway suctioning (CAS) system in sixteen ASA Class I-II patients undergoing surgery of the extremities. All patients were anesthetized with 50% N2O and oxygen with adequate halogenated anesthesia. Full muscle relaxation was provided and all patients were ventilated with an anesthesia volume controlled ventilator. Endotracheal suctioning without preoxygenation was performed during anesthesia in randomly selected patients by either the CAS or the standard suctioning (SS) technique with a 30 minute rest period between suctioning. Both CAS and SS, used 14Fr catheters, were applied intermittently for 15 seconds at (-)150 mmHg suctioning pressure. SaO2 was continuously monitored throughout the suction period by a pulse oximeter. Arterial blood gas sample was drawn before each suction and 30 sec., 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min afterwards. No alteration of SaO2 or PaO2 was noted during CAS but significant lowering of PaO2 was noted for SS at the 30 seconds and 1 minutes post-suctional points. Potential advantages of CAS include: 1) PEEP can be maintained during suctioning. 2) Operating room pollution is minimized. 3) Accidental contamination of both the patient and the anesthesiologist can be prevented. 4) Time is saved during frequent intraoperative suctioning as no preoxygenation is required. 5) There is no need to turn off the anesthetic gases. We conclude that as CAS can maintain steady PaO2 during airway suctioning, it may be a better alternative for repeated intraoperative suctioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":77247,"journal":{"name":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of a closed airway suctioning (CAS) system in sixteen ASA Class I-II patients undergoing surgery of the extremities. All patients were anesthetized with 50% N2O and oxygen with adequate halogenated anesthesia. Full muscle relaxation was provided and all patients were ventilated with an anesthesia volume controlled ventilator. Endotracheal suctioning without preoxygenation was performed during anesthesia in randomly selected patients by either the CAS or the standard suctioning (SS) technique with a 30 minute rest period between suctioning. Both CAS and SS, used 14Fr catheters, were applied intermittently for 15 seconds at (-)150 mmHg suctioning pressure. SaO2 was continuously monitored throughout the suction period by a pulse oximeter. Arterial blood gas sample was drawn before each suction and 30 sec., 1 min, 3 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min afterwards. No alteration of SaO2 or PaO2 was noted during CAS but significant lowering of PaO2 was noted for SS at the 30 seconds and 1 minutes post-suctional points. Potential advantages of CAS include: 1) PEEP can be maintained during suctioning. 2) Operating room pollution is minimized. 3) Accidental contamination of both the patient and the anesthesiologist can be prevented. 4) Time is saved during frequent intraoperative suctioning as no preoxygenation is required. 5) There is no need to turn off the anesthetic gases. We conclude that as CAS can maintain steady PaO2 during airway suctioning, it may be a better alternative for repeated intraoperative suctioning.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在麻醉过程中使用封闭气道吸引系统。
我们评估了封闭气道吸引(CAS)系统在16例ASA I-II级肢体手术患者中的疗效。所有患者均以50% N2O和氧气麻醉,并给予充分的卤化麻醉。给予充分的肌肉松弛,所有患者均使用麻醉量控制呼吸机进行通气。随机选择患者在麻醉期间采用CAS或标准吸痰(SS)技术进行无预充氧气管内吸痰,吸痰间隔30分钟。CAS和SS均采用14Fr导管,在(-)150mmhg吸压下间歇应用15秒。在整个抽吸期间,通过脉搏血氧计连续监测SaO2。每次抽吸前及抽吸后30秒、1分钟、3分钟、5分钟、10分钟、15分钟、30分钟采集动脉血气。在CAS过程中,SaO2和PaO2没有变化,但在吸后30秒和1分钟时,SS的PaO2明显降低。CAS的潜在优点包括:1)在吸痰过程中可以保持PEEP。2)尽量减少手术室污染。3)可以防止意外污染患者和麻醉师。4)术中频繁抽吸,无需预充氧,节省时间。没有必要关闭麻醉气体。综上所述,由于CAS可以在气道吸引过程中维持稳定的PaO2,因此可能是术中重复吸引的更好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolonged fasting in pediatric outpatients does not cause hypoglycemia. Continuous succinylcholine infusion and phase II block in short surgical procedures. [Pheochromocytoma]. [Anesthetic management of intraoperatively diagnosed pheochromocytoma--a case report]. [Postoperative hypoglycemia after pheochromocytoma resection].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1