Morbidity from anterior ilium bone harvest

Pairot Tayapongsak DMD (Assistant Professor) , James A. Wimsatt DDS (Formerly Chief Resident) , John P. LaBanc DDS, MS (Formerly Associate Professor) , M.Franklin Dolwick DMD, PhD (Professor)
{"title":"Morbidity from anterior ilium bone harvest","authors":"Pairot Tayapongsak DMD (Assistant Professor) ,&nbsp;James A. Wimsatt DDS (Formerly Chief Resident) ,&nbsp;John P. LaBanc DDS, MS (Formerly Associate Professor) ,&nbsp;M.Franklin Dolwick DMD, PhD (Professor)","doi":"10.1016/0030-4220(94)90057-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The morbidity of bone harvest was compared between anterior lateral and medial surgical approaches in a randomized prospective study. Forty consecutive patients, each requiring a minimum 40 cc of loose corticocancellous bone for maxillofacial reconstruction, were randomly placed into two equal groups. Morbidity vectors assessed included bone volume, blood loss, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, incidence of seroma, incidence of anterior thigh paresthesia, postoperative pain, and gait disturbance. The results demonstrated no significant difference in morbidity between these two approaches; therefore selection of either approach is the surgeon's personal preference. A thorough understanding of the osseous anatomy of the anterior ilium and its muscular attachments, a good surgical technique, an efficient surgical team, and a continuous flow of required surgical instruments are essential to reduce the morbidity of bone harvest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100992,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology","volume":"78 3","pages":"Pages 296-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90057-4","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030422094900574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

The morbidity of bone harvest was compared between anterior lateral and medial surgical approaches in a randomized prospective study. Forty consecutive patients, each requiring a minimum 40 cc of loose corticocancellous bone for maxillofacial reconstruction, were randomly placed into two equal groups. Morbidity vectors assessed included bone volume, blood loss, length of surgery, length of hospital stay, incidence of seroma, incidence of anterior thigh paresthesia, postoperative pain, and gait disturbance. The results demonstrated no significant difference in morbidity between these two approaches; therefore selection of either approach is the surgeon's personal preference. A thorough understanding of the osseous anatomy of the anterior ilium and its muscular attachments, a good surgical technique, an efficient surgical team, and a continuous flow of required surgical instruments are essential to reduce the morbidity of bone harvest.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髂骨前截骨的发病率
在一项随机前瞻性研究中,比较了前外侧和内侧手术入路的骨采集发病率。连续40例患者随机分为两组,每例患者至少需要40cc的皮质松质骨进行颌面部重建。评估的发病媒介包括骨体积、失血量、手术时间、住院时间、血肿发生率、大腿前部感觉异常发生率、术后疼痛和步态障碍。结果显示两种方法的发病率无显著差异;因此,选择哪一种入路取决于外科医生的个人喜好。全面了解前髂骨及其肌肉附着物的骨解剖结构,良好的手术技术,高效的手术团队以及所需手术器械的连续流动是减少骨摘取发病率的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The urofacial syndrome Subject index News and announcements Author index Identification and semiquantification of estrogen and progesterone receptors in pyogenic granulomas of pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1