Effects of physician prompters on long-term screening test behaviors.

Family practice research journal Pub Date : 1994-09-01
W J Hueston, M A Stiles
{"title":"Effects of physician prompters on long-term screening test behaviors.","authors":"W J Hueston,&nbsp;M A Stiles","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the long term effects of a prompter directed at a single screening test on the performance of preventive tests 12 to 24 months later.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed that compared 114 patients who had a Papanicolau (Pap) smear prompter placed on their charts in 1990 with 86 patients who did not have a prompter placed. Chart audits determined if a Pap smear, breast examination, mammogram, rectal examination, stool occult blood, or serum cholesterol determination was performed 12 to 24 months after the prompter had been placed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the patient population that received prompters more than one year earlier, a significant increase was observed in Pap smears (40% vs 24%, p = 0.05), breast examinations (37% vs 20%, p = 0.009), and digital rectal examinations in patients 50 years of age and older (20% vs 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When a prompter is placed on a chart to change physician behavior, a lasting effect is seen over one year later. However, increased screening is only observed in patients who initially had prompters placed on their charts. This may indicate that this change in screening behaviors is due to alterations in patient and not physician behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":77127,"journal":{"name":"Family practice research journal","volume":"14 3","pages":"251-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examines the long term effects of a prompter directed at a single screening test on the performance of preventive tests 12 to 24 months later.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed that compared 114 patients who had a Papanicolau (Pap) smear prompter placed on their charts in 1990 with 86 patients who did not have a prompter placed. Chart audits determined if a Pap smear, breast examination, mammogram, rectal examination, stool occult blood, or serum cholesterol determination was performed 12 to 24 months after the prompter had been placed.

Results: In the patient population that received prompters more than one year earlier, a significant increase was observed in Pap smears (40% vs 24%, p = 0.05), breast examinations (37% vs 20%, p = 0.009), and digital rectal examinations in patients 50 years of age and older (20% vs 0%).

Conclusions: When a prompter is placed on a chart to change physician behavior, a lasting effect is seen over one year later. However, increased screening is only observed in patients who initially had prompters placed on their charts. This may indicate that this change in screening behaviors is due to alterations in patient and not physician behaviors.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医师提示对长期筛查试验行为的影响。
背景:本研究考察了针对单一筛选试验的提示器对12至24个月后预防性试验性能的长期影响。方法:对1990年114例有宫颈抹片提示器的患者与86例未有提示器的患者进行回顾性图表分析。图表检查确定是否在提示器放置12至24个月后进行了子宫颈抹片检查、乳房检查、乳房x光检查、直肠检查、粪便隐血或血清胆固醇测定。结果:在接受提示剂超过一年的患者人群中,观察到巴氏涂片检查(40%对24%,p = 0.05),乳房检查(37%对20%,p = 0.009)和50岁及以上患者直肠指检(20%对0%)的显着增加。结论:当一个提示符被放置在图表上改变医生的行为时,一年后可以看到持久的效果。然而,增加的筛查只在最初在他们的图表上放置提示器的患者中观察到。这可能表明这种筛查行为的改变是由于患者行为的改变,而不是医生行为的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles of survey research. Desirable features of qualitative research. Consideration of venue and vehicle in health behavior research with adolescents. Reliability of survey about immunization barriers in Minnesota. Should primary care physicians take care of diabetes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1