Normal ranges for bone loss rates

Philip D. Ross , Yi-Fan He , James W. Davis , Robert S. Epstein , Richard D. Wasnich
{"title":"Normal ranges for bone loss rates","authors":"Philip D. Ross ,&nbsp;Yi-Fan He ,&nbsp;James W. Davis ,&nbsp;Robert S. Epstein ,&nbsp;Richard D. Wasnich","doi":"10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80061-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We reported previously that the variability in bone loss rates among postmenopausal women decreases dramatically during the first few years of followup. In this paper, we have examined the distributions of bone loss rates measured at the calcaneus, distal radius and proximal radius. The incidence of physical impairment was five times greater among women with bone loss rates faster than 2 S.D. below the mean. Because the rate of change in bone density was skewed at the lower end of the distribution (representing rapid bone loss), the influence of values at the extreme ends of the distribution were statistically removed in order to estimate the normal distribution of bone loss rates. For the convenience of clinicians, the upper and lower limits of the 90 and 70% normal ranges are presented. Because average bone loss rates vary with age, normal ranges are provided separately by age group. The width of each normal range decreased by at least half after 3 or 4 years of followup, compared to less than 1 year. Consequently, measured loss rates which were well within the normal range at 1 year were sometimes far outside the normal range for longer followup times. We conclude that followup duration has a profound effect on estimates of the normal range, and must be considered when interpreting the clinical significance of measured loss rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77047,"journal":{"name":"Bone and mineral","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 169-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80061-X","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone and mineral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016960090880061X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

We reported previously that the variability in bone loss rates among postmenopausal women decreases dramatically during the first few years of followup. In this paper, we have examined the distributions of bone loss rates measured at the calcaneus, distal radius and proximal radius. The incidence of physical impairment was five times greater among women with bone loss rates faster than 2 S.D. below the mean. Because the rate of change in bone density was skewed at the lower end of the distribution (representing rapid bone loss), the influence of values at the extreme ends of the distribution were statistically removed in order to estimate the normal distribution of bone loss rates. For the convenience of clinicians, the upper and lower limits of the 90 and 70% normal ranges are presented. Because average bone loss rates vary with age, normal ranges are provided separately by age group. The width of each normal range decreased by at least half after 3 or 4 years of followup, compared to less than 1 year. Consequently, measured loss rates which were well within the normal range at 1 year were sometimes far outside the normal range for longer followup times. We conclude that followup duration has a profound effect on estimates of the normal range, and must be considered when interpreting the clinical significance of measured loss rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨质流失率的正常范围
我们以前报道过,绝经后妇女骨质流失率的变异性在最初几年的随访中急剧下降。在本文中,我们研究了跟骨、桡骨远端和桡骨近端骨丢失率的分布。在骨质流失率低于平均值2 sd的女性中,身体损伤的发生率是平均值的5倍。由于骨密度的变化率在分布的下端是偏斜的(代表快速骨质流失),为了估计骨质流失率的正态分布,在统计上删除了分布的极端端值的影响。为方便临床医生使用,给出了90%和70%正常范围的上下限。由于平均骨质流失率随年龄的变化而变化,正常范围按年龄组单独提供。与不到1年的随访相比,在3或4年随访后,每个正常范围的宽度至少减少了一半。因此,测量的损失率在1年的正常范围内,有时在较长的随访时间内远远超出正常范围。我们得出结论,随访时间对正常范围的估计有深远的影响,在解释测量损失率的临床意义时必须考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Selected bibliography. Socio-economic status and fertility decline: Insights from historical transitions in Europe and North America. Subject index Author index Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1