Anaphylaxis due to limpet ingestion.

Annals of allergy Pub Date : 1994-12-01
T Carrillo, F Rodríguez de Castro, C Blanco, R Castillo, J Quiralte, M Cuevas
{"title":"Anaphylaxis due to limpet ingestion.","authors":"T Carrillo,&nbsp;F Rodríguez de Castro,&nbsp;C Blanco,&nbsp;R Castillo,&nbsp;J Quiralte,&nbsp;M Cuevas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The limpet, phylum Mollusca, is one of the most frequent sea mollusks in the Canary Islands. Limpet IgE hypersensitivity reactions have been described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe six patients with anaphylactic reactions due to limpet ingestion and to demonstrate by in vivo methods and by in vitro techniques specific IgE responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six subjects who developed severe bronchospasm 30 to 120 minutes after eating limpets were included in the present study. The antigenic material for the in vivo and in vitro studies was an extract of cooked limpet prepared in our laboratory. Skin prick tests were performed in all patients using commercially available aeroallergens, mollusk, and crustacean extracts; the same skin tests were performed using the extracts prepared in our laboratory. Specific IgE by CAP and RAST and CAP inhibition studies were also performed. Limpet contamination by mites was excluded through a commercial ELISA using monoclonal antibodies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had positive skin prick tests to D. pteronyssinus and cooked limpet extract and weak reactivity to cockroach and raw limpet extract. Specific IgE to mites and cooked limpet extract was also found using CAP and RAST techniques, respectively. The possible existence of common epitopes between limpet and D. pteronyssinus was excluded by CAP inhibition studies. Finally, no significant mite concentration was detected in the cooked limpet extract analyzed by a commercially available ELISA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Limpet is a potentially dangerous allergen specially in patients sensitized to D. pteronyssinus.</p>","PeriodicalId":7931,"journal":{"name":"Annals of allergy","volume":"73 6","pages":"504-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The limpet, phylum Mollusca, is one of the most frequent sea mollusks in the Canary Islands. Limpet IgE hypersensitivity reactions have been described.

Objective: To describe six patients with anaphylactic reactions due to limpet ingestion and to demonstrate by in vivo methods and by in vitro techniques specific IgE responses.

Methods: Six subjects who developed severe bronchospasm 30 to 120 minutes after eating limpets were included in the present study. The antigenic material for the in vivo and in vitro studies was an extract of cooked limpet prepared in our laboratory. Skin prick tests were performed in all patients using commercially available aeroallergens, mollusk, and crustacean extracts; the same skin tests were performed using the extracts prepared in our laboratory. Specific IgE by CAP and RAST and CAP inhibition studies were also performed. Limpet contamination by mites was excluded through a commercial ELISA using monoclonal antibodies.

Results: All patients had positive skin prick tests to D. pteronyssinus and cooked limpet extract and weak reactivity to cockroach and raw limpet extract. Specific IgE to mites and cooked limpet extract was also found using CAP and RAST techniques, respectively. The possible existence of common epitopes between limpet and D. pteronyssinus was excluded by CAP inhibition studies. Finally, no significant mite concentration was detected in the cooked limpet extract analyzed by a commercially available ELISA.

Conclusions: Limpet is a potentially dangerous allergen specially in patients sensitized to D. pteronyssinus.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因摄入帽贝引起的过敏反应。
背景:帽贝,软体动物门,是加那利群岛最常见的海洋软体动物之一。帽贝IgE超敏反应已被描述。目的:描述6例因摄入帽贝引起的过敏反应,并通过体内方法和体外技术证明特异性IgE反应。方法:选取6例食用帽贝后30 ~ 120分钟发生严重支气管痉挛的患者作为研究对象。体内和体外研究的抗原材料是我们实验室制备的熟帽贝提取物。使用市售的空气过敏原、软体动物和甲壳类动物提取物对所有患者进行皮肤点刺试验;使用本实验室制备的提取物进行相同的皮肤试验。通过CAP和RAST进行特异性IgE和CAP抑制研究。使用单克隆抗体通过商用ELISA排除帽贝污染。结果:所有患者皮肤针刺试验均阳性,对蟑螂和生帽贝提取物反应弱。利用CAP和RAST技术分别检测到对螨和熟帽贝提取物的特异性IgE。CAP抑制研究排除了帽贝和翼龙蝶之间可能存在共同表位的可能性。最后,用市售的酶联免疫吸附法对煮熟的帽贝提取物进行分析,没有检测到显著的螨虫浓度。结论:帽贝是一种潜在的危险过敏原,特别是对蝶翼蝶窦致敏的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lyme disease. Familial cold urticaria. Allergic arthritis. Use of nasal cytology in the diagnosis of occult chronic sinusitis in asthmatic children. Comparison of budesonide and disodium cromoglycate for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1