Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras.

B Veress, I Alafuzoff
{"title":"Clinical diagnostic accuracy audited by autopsy in a university hospital in two eras.","authors":"B Veress, I Alafuzoff","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.4.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A retrospective analysis of 3042 autopsies was carried out to determine and compare the discrepancy rates between clinical and autopsy diagnoses as well as the sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics in 10 diseases in 1977/78 and 1987/88. The autopsy rate decreased from 80% to 39%, which might explain the increased discrepancy rate from 22% to 27% regarding the diagnoses of major, principal diseases. The accuracy of clinical diagnostics seemed to improve during the period for some of the diseases (pulmonary embolism, peptic ulcer, infectious carditis, peritonitis), while it worsened for others (acute myocardial infarction, thrombosis of the mesenteric artery, ruptured aortic aneurysm, tuberculosis) or remained unchanged (cirrhosis of the liver, malignant tumours regarded as a whole group). The findings underline the importance of autopsies and their cumulative studies in assessing the accuracy and providing data for the determination of necessary fallibility of clinical diagnostics.","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 4","pages":"281-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.4.281","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.4.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of 3042 autopsies was carried out to determine and compare the discrepancy rates between clinical and autopsy diagnoses as well as the sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnostics in 10 diseases in 1977/78 and 1987/88. The autopsy rate decreased from 80% to 39%, which might explain the increased discrepancy rate from 22% to 27% regarding the diagnoses of major, principal diseases. The accuracy of clinical diagnostics seemed to improve during the period for some of the diseases (pulmonary embolism, peptic ulcer, infectious carditis, peritonitis), while it worsened for others (acute myocardial infarction, thrombosis of the mesenteric artery, ruptured aortic aneurysm, tuberculosis) or remained unchanged (cirrhosis of the liver, malignant tumours regarded as a whole group). The findings underline the importance of autopsies and their cumulative studies in assessing the accuracy and providing data for the determination of necessary fallibility of clinical diagnostics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两个时代的大学医院尸检对临床诊断准确性的审计。
回顾性分析了1977/78年和1987/88年3042例尸检病例,比较了10种疾病的临床诊断与尸检诊断的差异率以及临床诊断的敏感性和特异性。尸检率从80%下降到39%,这可能解释了主要疾病诊断的差异率从22%增加到27%。在此期间,对某些疾病(肺栓塞、消化性溃疡、感染性心肌炎、腹膜炎)的临床诊断的准确性似乎有所提高,而对其他疾病(急性心肌梗死、肠系膜动脉血栓形成、主动脉瘤破裂、肺结核)的临床诊断的准确性则有所恶化或保持不变(肝硬化、恶性肿瘤作为一个整体)。这些发现强调了尸检及其累积研究在评估准确性和为确定临床诊断的必要不可靠性提供数据方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The current status of autopsies in medical care in the USA. Decrease in the frequency of autopsies in Denmark after the introduction of a new autopsy act. Decreasing autopsy rate in Sweden reflects changing attitudes among clinicians. The meta-autopsy: changing techniques and attitudes towards the autopsy. The reliability of autopsy diagnostics: inter-observer variation between pathologists, a preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1