Fracture strength prediction in rat femoral shaft and neck by single photon absorptiometry of the femoral shaft

Lars Nordsletten , Trine Sand Kaastad , Sigmund Skjeldal , Olav Reikerås , Knut P. Nordal , Johan Halse , Arne Ekeland
{"title":"Fracture strength prediction in rat femoral shaft and neck by single photon absorptiometry of the femoral shaft","authors":"Lars Nordsletten ,&nbsp;Trine Sand Kaastad ,&nbsp;Sigmund Skjeldal ,&nbsp;Olav Reikerås ,&nbsp;Knut P. Nordal ,&nbsp;Johan Halse ,&nbsp;Arne Ekeland","doi":"10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80206-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral midshaft from 15 skeletally mature male rats were measured by Single Photon Absorptiometry (SPA), and comparisons made to fracture strength of the femoral diaphysis and the femoral neck. In stepwise regression the factors contributing significantly to the ultimate bending moment of the shaft were BMC and femoral length. BMC correlated strongly with the ultimate bending moment of the femoral diaphysis (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.63, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The correlation between BMC and ultimate moment of the femoral neck was moderate (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.51, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The correlations between BMD and mechanical parameters were lower than the corresponding values for BMC, with a significant result only for the bending moment of the femoral diaphysis (<em>r</em><sup>2</sup> = 0.48, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). In conclusion, BMC rather than BMD, is most predictive for fracture strength of the femur in rats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77047,"journal":{"name":"Bone and mineral","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 39-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80206-1","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone and mineral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169600908802061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral midshaft from 15 skeletally mature male rats were measured by Single Photon Absorptiometry (SPA), and comparisons made to fracture strength of the femoral diaphysis and the femoral neck. In stepwise regression the factors contributing significantly to the ultimate bending moment of the shaft were BMC and femoral length. BMC correlated strongly with the ultimate bending moment of the femoral diaphysis (r2 = 0.63, P < 0.01). The correlation between BMC and ultimate moment of the femoral neck was moderate (r2 = 0.51, P < 0.01). The correlations between BMD and mechanical parameters were lower than the corresponding values for BMC, with a significant result only for the bending moment of the femoral diaphysis (r2 = 0.48, P < 0.01). In conclusion, BMC rather than BMD, is most predictive for fracture strength of the femur in rats.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用股骨干单光子吸收法预测大鼠股骨干及颈骨折强度
采用单光子吸收仪(SPA)测定了15只成年雄性大鼠股骨中轴的骨矿物质含量(BMC)和骨密度(BMD),并与股骨骨干和股骨颈的断裂强度进行了比较。在逐步回归中,对脊柱极限弯矩有显著影响的因素是BMC和股骨长度。BMC与股骨干极限弯矩呈正相关(r2 = 0.63, P <0.01)。BMC与股骨颈极限力矩的相关性中等(r2 = 0.51, P <0.01)。骨密度与力学参数的相关性低于骨密度的相应值,只有股骨干弯矩与力学参数的相关性显著(r2 = 0.48, P <0.01)。总之,BMC比BMD更能预测大鼠股骨的断裂强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Selected bibliography. Socio-economic status and fertility decline: Insights from historical transitions in Europe and North America. Subject index Author index Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1