Quantifying the density of Friedman's pathogenic emotions (AIAI).

M W Ketterer, W R Lovallo, M A Lumley
{"title":"Quantifying the density of Friedman's pathogenic emotions (AIAI).","authors":"M W Ketterer,&nbsp;W R Lovallo,&nbsp;M A Lumley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of both psychoneuroendocrine and psychobehavioral mechanisms, the chronicity of negative emotional arousal is probably the final common pathway mediating the relationship of psychosocial factors (cognitions, environments and behaviors) on one side of the mind-brain chasm, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) on the other. But the problem of \"denial\" remains a potential source of measurement error in studies of the association of such factors and IHD endpoints. The present study examined the association of patient-reported and spouse/friend-reported AIAI (aggravation, irritation, anger and impatience) with four measures of Type A Behavior or hostility (the Framingham Type A Scale, Cook-Medley Hostility Scale, Type A Structured Interview and a Hostility rating from the Structured Interview) in two samples: 175 men undergoing coronary angiography; and 56 age and SES-matched males with no manifest history of occlusive atherosclerotic disease. Chronic AIAI was underreported by the sample as a whole relative to spouse/friend perception, while the opposite was true of Depression and Anxiety/Worry (p < .001). All four measures were significantly associated with both patient and spouse/friend reported chronicity of AIAI, but the FTAS was the most reliable correlate according to both sources. The FTAS was also negatively associated with denial of AIAI, while the other three measures were not.</p>","PeriodicalId":77182,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychosomatics : official publication of the International Psychosomatics Institute","volume":"40 1-4","pages":"22-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychosomatics : official publication of the International Psychosomatics Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because of both psychoneuroendocrine and psychobehavioral mechanisms, the chronicity of negative emotional arousal is probably the final common pathway mediating the relationship of psychosocial factors (cognitions, environments and behaviors) on one side of the mind-brain chasm, and ischemic heart disease (IHD) on the other. But the problem of "denial" remains a potential source of measurement error in studies of the association of such factors and IHD endpoints. The present study examined the association of patient-reported and spouse/friend-reported AIAI (aggravation, irritation, anger and impatience) with four measures of Type A Behavior or hostility (the Framingham Type A Scale, Cook-Medley Hostility Scale, Type A Structured Interview and a Hostility rating from the Structured Interview) in two samples: 175 men undergoing coronary angiography; and 56 age and SES-matched males with no manifest history of occlusive atherosclerotic disease. Chronic AIAI was underreported by the sample as a whole relative to spouse/friend perception, while the opposite was true of Depression and Anxiety/Worry (p < .001). All four measures were significantly associated with both patient and spouse/friend reported chronicity of AIAI, but the FTAS was the most reliable correlate according to both sources. The FTAS was also negatively associated with denial of AIAI, while the other three measures were not.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化弗里德曼致病情绪(AIAI)的密度。
由于心理神经内分泌和心理行为机制的共同作用,负性情绪唤醒的慢性性可能是调解心脑鸿沟一侧的社会心理因素(认知、环境和行为)与缺血性心脏病(IHD)之间关系的最终共同途径。但是,在研究这些因素与IHD终点的关联时,“否认”问题仍然是测量误差的潜在来源。本研究在两个样本中检验了患者报告和配偶/朋友报告的AIAI(加重、刺激、愤怒和不耐烦)与四种A型行为或敌意(Framingham A型量表、Cook-Medley敌意量表、A型结构化访谈和结构化访谈中的敌意评级)的关系:175名接受冠状动脉造影的男性;56名年龄和ses匹配且无明显动脉粥样硬化病史的男性。相对于配偶/朋友的感知,慢性AIAI在整个样本中被低估了,而抑郁和焦虑/担忧的情况正好相反(p < 0.001)。所有四种测量都与患者和配偶/朋友报告的AIAI慢性程度显著相关,但根据两种来源,FTAS是最可靠的相关性。自由贸易协定也与AIAI的拒绝负相关,而其他三个措施则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effects of electrode placement upon EEG biofeedback training: the monopolar-bipolar controversy. Anxiety and its control. Implanted transmitter in maxilla: real or imaginary? Psychotherapeutic implications of self-discoveries made in exploring psychologically-caused physical symptoms. Psychological factors in psychosomatic diseases: an outline of research results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1