{"title":"Effects of acute allergen exposure on posture-induced changes in airway responsiveness to methacholine in asthma.","authors":"M Tahan, J Milot, L P Boulet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The influence of an allergen challenge on recumbency induced changes in airway responsiveness to methacholine was documented in seven nonsmoking subjects with stable mild asthma (3M, 4F).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All subjects spent four hours (8 to 12 AM) in the supine position before and 24 hours after an allergen challenge that induced a dual asthmatic response. FEV1 was measured hourly in the supine position and a methacholine challenge was done in the sitting position before and after each 4-hour period. None used bronchial antiinflammatory drugs before or during the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean maximal fall in FEV1 (+/- SEM) was 31.0 +/- 1.1% within one hour of the last allergen inhalation and 27.5 +/- 4.9% between two and eight hours later. Presupine/postsupine session FEV1 (%pred +/- SEM) was unchanged either at baseline or postallergen challenge sessions, with values of 89.3 +/- 2.7/88.3 +/- 5.1 and 86.6 +/- 4.2/87.4 +/- 5.7. Presupine/postsupine PC20 methacholine was slightly reduced but this did not reach statistical significance (P > .05), with a mean PC20 (mg/mL) of 0.83 +/- 1.44/0.52 +/- 1.46 (preallergen session); 0.55 +/- 1.44/0.39 +/- 1.37 (postallergen challenge session). This delta PC20 (baseline/post-session) did not differ between the two sessions (P > .05). The delta PC20 was not correlated with the magnitude of the late asthmatic response to allergen nor the postallergen increase in airway responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that an acute allergen challenge does not significantly increase recumbency-induced changes in airway response to methacholine in patients with mild asthma. The possibility of a significant influence of pro-inflammatory stimuli on recumbency-induced changes in bronchomotor tone in more severe patients or if the stimulus is repeated should be further assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7931,"journal":{"name":"Annals of allergy","volume":"73 3","pages":"247-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The influence of an allergen challenge on recumbency induced changes in airway responsiveness to methacholine was documented in seven nonsmoking subjects with stable mild asthma (3M, 4F).
Methods: All subjects spent four hours (8 to 12 AM) in the supine position before and 24 hours after an allergen challenge that induced a dual asthmatic response. FEV1 was measured hourly in the supine position and a methacholine challenge was done in the sitting position before and after each 4-hour period. None used bronchial antiinflammatory drugs before or during the study.
Results: The mean maximal fall in FEV1 (+/- SEM) was 31.0 +/- 1.1% within one hour of the last allergen inhalation and 27.5 +/- 4.9% between two and eight hours later. Presupine/postsupine session FEV1 (%pred +/- SEM) was unchanged either at baseline or postallergen challenge sessions, with values of 89.3 +/- 2.7/88.3 +/- 5.1 and 86.6 +/- 4.2/87.4 +/- 5.7. Presupine/postsupine PC20 methacholine was slightly reduced but this did not reach statistical significance (P > .05), with a mean PC20 (mg/mL) of 0.83 +/- 1.44/0.52 +/- 1.46 (preallergen session); 0.55 +/- 1.44/0.39 +/- 1.37 (postallergen challenge session). This delta PC20 (baseline/post-session) did not differ between the two sessions (P > .05). The delta PC20 was not correlated with the magnitude of the late asthmatic response to allergen nor the postallergen increase in airway responsiveness.
Conclusions: We conclude that an acute allergen challenge does not significantly increase recumbency-induced changes in airway response to methacholine in patients with mild asthma. The possibility of a significant influence of pro-inflammatory stimuli on recumbency-induced changes in bronchomotor tone in more severe patients or if the stimulus is repeated should be further assessed.