Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.

P Kiilholma, J Mäkinen, T Tenho, Y Pitkänen, T Hirvonen
{"title":"Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.","authors":"P Kiilholma,&nbsp;J Mäkinen,&nbsp;T Tenho,&nbsp;Y Pitkänen,&nbsp;T Hirvonen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance and handling capacities of two synthetic absorbable sutures, the monofilament suture Maxon and the multifilament suture Dexon Plus, were compared to study if these sutures are acceptable as all-purpose suture materials in abdominal hysterectomy. Four senior gynecological surgeons performed altogether 102 hysterectomies and made an assessment of handling qualities. Fifty one patients were sutured with Maxon and 51 age-matched controls with Dexon Plus. Maxon proved to be superior to Dexon Plus in terms of knot rundown, tissue drag and knot repositioning whereas, in terms of suppleness, tensile strength and knot security both suture materials were comparable. Vaginal granulation was seen in five patients operated on with Dexon Plus and only in one patient in the Maxon group. According to this study Maxon is as safe and efficacious as Dexon Plus for abdominal hysterectomy and its handling properties were even better than those of Dexon Plus.</p>","PeriodicalId":75497,"journal":{"name":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum","volume":"208 ","pages":"47-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales chirurgiae et gynaecologiae. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance and handling capacities of two synthetic absorbable sutures, the monofilament suture Maxon and the multifilament suture Dexon Plus, were compared to study if these sutures are acceptable as all-purpose suture materials in abdominal hysterectomy. Four senior gynecological surgeons performed altogether 102 hysterectomies and made an assessment of handling qualities. Fifty one patients were sutured with Maxon and 51 age-matched controls with Dexon Plus. Maxon proved to be superior to Dexon Plus in terms of knot rundown, tissue drag and knot repositioning whereas, in terms of suppleness, tensile strength and knot security both suture materials were comparable. Vaginal granulation was seen in five patients operated on with Dexon Plus and only in one patient in the Maxon group. According to this study Maxon is as safe and efficacious as Dexon Plus for abdominal hysterectomy and its handling properties were even better than those of Dexon Plus.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种缝合材料Dexon Plus和Maxon在腹部子宫切除术中的比较。
比较两种合成可吸收缝线的性能和处理能力,单丝缝线Maxon和多丝缝线Dexon Plus,研究这两种缝线是否可以作为腹部子宫切除术的通用缝合材料。4名资深妇科外科医生共完成102例子宫切除术,并对手术质量进行评价。51名患者使用Maxon缝合,51名年龄匹配的对照组使用Dexon Plus缝合。事实证明,Maxon在打结、组织阻力和打结重新定位方面优于Dexon Plus,而在柔软性、抗拉强度和打结安全性方面,两种缝合材料是相当的。5例Dexon Plus组患者出现阴道肉芽肿,而Maxon组仅1例。根据这项研究,Maxon在腹部子宫切除术中与Dexon Plus一样安全有效,其处理性能甚至优于Dexon Plus。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of chronic critical leg ischaemia--a cost benefit analysis. The effect of tumor necrosis factor-alpha on wound healing. An experimental study. Open biliary tract surgery on 2023 patients based on personal experience. A clinical study. Surgical results of lumbar spinal stenosis. Microinvasive lumbar disc surgery. A study on patients treated with microdiscectomy or percutaneous nucleotomy for disc herniation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1