[Citalopram (Seropram) in tablet and infusion forms in the treatment of major depression].

Ceskoslovenska psychiatrie Pub Date : 1993-12-01
J Svestka, E Cesková, V Kamenická, A Buresová, V Obrovská, O Synek
{"title":"[Citalopram (Seropram) in tablet and infusion forms in the treatment of major depression].","authors":"J Svestka,&nbsp;E Cesková,&nbsp;V Kamenická,&nbsp;A Buresová,&nbsp;V Obrovská,&nbsp;O Synek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Citalopram i.v. and oral had a reliable antidepressive and anxiolytic effect in 101 hospitalized patients, as apparent from the achievement of complete remission in cca 60% of the patients with major depression after four weeks follow-up. Treatment with citalopram by the intravenous or oral route was most successful in anxious or inhibitory depressions, while atypical forms with hypochondriac or obsedant features responded better to infusions. The global score of HAMD and FKD scales and typical symptoms of depression such as a pathic decreased mood, anhedonia, feelings of guilt, lack of interest, anxiety and suicidal thoughts were positively reduced. The following were not affected: loss of appetite, loss of weight, anosognosia, paranoidity, and hallucinations. The clinical onset of the therapeutic effect was on average apparent on the 10th-12th day of therapy, significantly sooner when the intravenous route was used. The authors did not find significant differences in the therapeutic results in patients under and above 60 years and in those with a mild or severe depression. As regards subjective preference and preference by relatives, infusions were unequivically preferred as they had, no doubt, also a psychological effect. As to the incidence of undesirable effects, the authors did not detect a difference between the two routes of administration of citalopram, which was well tolerated and 50% of the patients did not report any side-effects and the rare ones recorded were not more frequent than in 20% of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75693,"journal":{"name":"Ceskoslovenska psychiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceskoslovenska psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Citalopram i.v. and oral had a reliable antidepressive and anxiolytic effect in 101 hospitalized patients, as apparent from the achievement of complete remission in cca 60% of the patients with major depression after four weeks follow-up. Treatment with citalopram by the intravenous or oral route was most successful in anxious or inhibitory depressions, while atypical forms with hypochondriac or obsedant features responded better to infusions. The global score of HAMD and FKD scales and typical symptoms of depression such as a pathic decreased mood, anhedonia, feelings of guilt, lack of interest, anxiety and suicidal thoughts were positively reduced. The following were not affected: loss of appetite, loss of weight, anosognosia, paranoidity, and hallucinations. The clinical onset of the therapeutic effect was on average apparent on the 10th-12th day of therapy, significantly sooner when the intravenous route was used. The authors did not find significant differences in the therapeutic results in patients under and above 60 years and in those with a mild or severe depression. As regards subjective preference and preference by relatives, infusions were unequivically preferred as they had, no doubt, also a psychological effect. As to the incidence of undesirable effects, the authors did not detect a difference between the two routes of administration of citalopram, which was well tolerated and 50% of the patients did not report any side-effects and the rare ones recorded were not more frequent than in 20% of patients.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[西酞普兰(血清普兰)片剂和输液治疗重度抑郁症]。
在101例住院患者中,西酞普兰静脉注射和口服具有可靠的抗抑郁和抗焦虑作用,在4周随访后,60%的重度抑郁症患者的cca完全缓解。静脉或口服西酞普兰治疗焦虑性或抑郁性抑郁症最成功,而非典型忧郁症或肥胖症状的西酞普兰治疗效果更好。HAMD和FKD量表的总体得分和典型的抑郁症状,如悲剧性情绪下降、快感缺乏、内疚感、缺乏兴趣、焦虑和自杀念头,都得到了积极的减少。以下情况不受影响:食欲不振、体重减轻、病感失认症、偏执和幻觉。治疗效果平均在治疗第10 -12天出现,静脉给药明显更快。作者没有发现60岁以下和60岁以上患者以及轻度和重度抑郁症患者的治疗效果有显著差异。至于主观偏好和亲属偏好,输液无疑是首选,因为它们毫无疑问也有心理影响。关于不良反应的发生率,作者未发现西酞普兰两种给药途径之间的差异,西酞普兰耐受性良好,50%的患者未报告任何副作用,罕见的记录不高于20%的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Final considerations]. [Psychotherapy in psychiatry (and in medicine in general)]. [Neuropsychologic examinations and rehabilitation]. [Incidence of latent tetany in patients with panic disorder]. [Paroxetine in the treatment of depressive disorders (pilot study)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1