Human fetal tissue: ethical implications for use in research and treatment.

M S Markowitz
{"title":"Human fetal tissue: ethical implications for use in research and treatment.","authors":"M S Markowitz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research using human fetal tissue is well established in biomedical science and indicates promising results in clinical transplantation for some diseases. Because the most optimal tissue for use in transplantation is obtained from fetuses resulting from elective abortions, this technology provokes ethical controversy. Societal concern about the ethical feasibility of human fetal tissue transplantation research (HFTTR) culminates with its investigative use in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Reflective of such concern in the United States was the 1988 ban on federal funding for HFTTR using tissue obtained from electively terminated abortuses and the establishment of the HFTTR Panel. Considerations generating ethical debate about HFTTR include the moral status of the fetus, who should consent to use of fetal tissue in transplantation research, and issues related to complicity in, and legitimization of, abortion. The moratorium on federal funding for HFTTR has been lifted, but ethical issues and societal concerns remain unresolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":79429,"journal":{"name":"AWHONN's clinical issues in perinatal and women's health nursing","volume":"4 4","pages":"578-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AWHONN's clinical issues in perinatal and women's health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research using human fetal tissue is well established in biomedical science and indicates promising results in clinical transplantation for some diseases. Because the most optimal tissue for use in transplantation is obtained from fetuses resulting from elective abortions, this technology provokes ethical controversy. Societal concern about the ethical feasibility of human fetal tissue transplantation research (HFTTR) culminates with its investigative use in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Reflective of such concern in the United States was the 1988 ban on federal funding for HFTTR using tissue obtained from electively terminated abortuses and the establishment of the HFTTR Panel. Considerations generating ethical debate about HFTTR include the moral status of the fetus, who should consent to use of fetal tissue in transplantation research, and issues related to complicity in, and legitimization of, abortion. The moratorium on federal funding for HFTTR has been lifted, but ethical issues and societal concerns remain unresolved.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类胎儿组织:用于研究和治疗的伦理问题。
利用人类胎儿组织的研究在生物医学科学中已经建立起来,并且在一些疾病的临床移植中显示出有希望的结果。因为用于移植的最佳组织是从选择性流产的胎儿中获得的,这项技术引发了伦理争议。人类胎儿组织移植研究(HFTTR)在帕金森氏病治疗中的研究性应用引起了社会对其伦理可行性的关注。1988年,美国禁止使用选择性终止流产获得的组织为HFTTR提供联邦资金,并成立了HFTTR小组,这反映了美国的这种担忧。关于HFTTR引发伦理争论的考虑因素包括胎儿的道德地位,谁应该同意在移植研究中使用胎儿组织,以及与堕胎的共谋和合法化有关的问题。暂停为HFTTR提供联邦资金的禁令已被取消,但伦理问题和社会关切仍未得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethical principles and theories. Ethical models: facilitating clinical practice. Values: a guiding force. Dilemmas of moral distress: moral responsibility and nursing practice. Nursing ethics: the role of caring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1