[Profile of Chlamydia test utilization by the physicians of Laval].

L'union medicale du Canada Pub Date : 1993-11-01
L Arcand, H Arruda
{"title":"[Profile of Chlamydia test utilization by the physicians of Laval].","authors":"L Arcand,&nbsp;H Arruda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before recommending systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young sexually-active women in its population, the Laval Community Health Department set out to document current practices in chlamydia testing. The objective of the study was to determine for whom these tests were prescribed, by whom and why. Data were obtained from a representative sample of 413 medical records. The greatest proportion of tests were prescribed for young women between the ages of 15-24 years. More than 85% of the tests were ordered by general practitioners, most of whom practiced in both hospital setting and private clinics. More than half of the tests were administered to obtain a diagnosis; approximately 42% were done for screening purposes. The study revealed a failure to document the sexual history of patients. It was estimated that between 30 and 40% of Chlamydia tests were not justified in being prescribed (according to the recommendations in the literature). It is possible that the criteria in the medical literature are too complex for use in everyday practice. The authors recommend the creation of specific tools adapted to physicians' needs, and the development of a screening program based on a systematic, step-by-step approach to determine whether or not a test is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":18049,"journal":{"name":"L'union medicale du Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'union medicale du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Before recommending systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in young sexually-active women in its population, the Laval Community Health Department set out to document current practices in chlamydia testing. The objective of the study was to determine for whom these tests were prescribed, by whom and why. Data were obtained from a representative sample of 413 medical records. The greatest proportion of tests were prescribed for young women between the ages of 15-24 years. More than 85% of the tests were ordered by general practitioners, most of whom practiced in both hospital setting and private clinics. More than half of the tests were administered to obtain a diagnosis; approximately 42% were done for screening purposes. The study revealed a failure to document the sexual history of patients. It was estimated that between 30 and 40% of Chlamydia tests were not justified in being prescribed (according to the recommendations in the literature). It is possible that the criteria in the medical literature are too complex for use in everyday practice. The authors recommend the creation of specific tools adapted to physicians' needs, and the development of a screening program based on a systematic, step-by-step approach to determine whether or not a test is warranted.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[拉瓦尔州医生衣原体检测使用概况]。
在建议对性活跃的年轻妇女进行沙眼衣原体系统筛查之前,拉瓦尔社区卫生部门着手记录衣原体检测的现行做法。这项研究的目的是确定这些测试是为谁开的,由谁开的,为什么开的。数据来自413份医疗记录的代表性样本。15-24岁的年轻妇女接受检查的比例最大。超过85%的检查是由全科医生安排的,他们中的大多数在医院和私人诊所执业。超过一半的测试是为了获得诊断;大约42%是为了筛查。这项研究表明,没有记录患者的性史。据估计,30%至40%的衣原体检测没有被证明是合理的(根据文献中的建议)。医学文献中的标准可能过于复杂,无法在日常实践中使用。作者建议创建适合医生需求的特定工具,并开发基于系统的、逐步的方法的筛查程序,以确定是否需要进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Scanning electron microscopy]. [Infectious diseases]. [Allergic rhinitis]. [Sigmoid volvulus]. [Understanding the treatment of migraine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1