{"title":"Design of helix ends. Amino acid preferences, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions.","authors":"S Dasgupta, J A Bell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The amino acid sequence and chemical interactions at the ends of 163 helices were surveyed so as better to understand amino acid preferences previously observed [Richardson, J.S. & Richardson, D.C. (1988) Science 240, 1648-1652]. Amino acid preferences differed from the previous survey in some significant details and in ways that might affect the choice of amino acids during the design of a protein helix. The following major conclusions about helix ends were deduced from additional patterns of amino acid occurrence and interactions that were observed. (1) A specific pair of hydrogen bonds is often observed between a glutamic acid (or glutamine) side chain at the N3 position and the N-cap amide hydrogen, and between the N-cap side chain (often threonine) and the N3 amide hydrogen. This reciprocal interaction may be an important means of stabilizing the N-terminal end of a helix. (2) Negatively charged amino acids (aspartic acid and glutamic acid) at the N-terminal end of helices may be more important in stabilizing protein helices than positively charged residues (chiefly lysine) at the C-terminal end. (3) The identity of the residue at the N-cap position is correlated with the backbone conformation at that position. (4) Aspartic acid (or asparagine) at the N2 or N3 position may adopt a conformation that suggests a hydrogen-bonding interaction with the end of the helix, especially when the N-cap side chain does not form a hydrogen bond with the end of the helix.</p>","PeriodicalId":14204,"journal":{"name":"International journal of peptide and protein research","volume":"41 5","pages":"499-511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of peptide and protein research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The amino acid sequence and chemical interactions at the ends of 163 helices were surveyed so as better to understand amino acid preferences previously observed [Richardson, J.S. & Richardson, D.C. (1988) Science 240, 1648-1652]. Amino acid preferences differed from the previous survey in some significant details and in ways that might affect the choice of amino acids during the design of a protein helix. The following major conclusions about helix ends were deduced from additional patterns of amino acid occurrence and interactions that were observed. (1) A specific pair of hydrogen bonds is often observed between a glutamic acid (or glutamine) side chain at the N3 position and the N-cap amide hydrogen, and between the N-cap side chain (often threonine) and the N3 amide hydrogen. This reciprocal interaction may be an important means of stabilizing the N-terminal end of a helix. (2) Negatively charged amino acids (aspartic acid and glutamic acid) at the N-terminal end of helices may be more important in stabilizing protein helices than positively charged residues (chiefly lysine) at the C-terminal end. (3) The identity of the residue at the N-cap position is correlated with the backbone conformation at that position. (4) Aspartic acid (or asparagine) at the N2 or N3 position may adopt a conformation that suggests a hydrogen-bonding interaction with the end of the helix, especially when the N-cap side chain does not form a hydrogen bond with the end of the helix.