An analysis of the reliability of self reported work histories from a cohort of workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.

C R Rosenberg
{"title":"An analysis of the reliability of self reported work histories from a cohort of workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.","authors":"C R Rosenberg","doi":"10.1136/oem.50.9.822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An investigation was conducted to examine the reliability (reproducibility) of self reported occupational histories obtained from a cohort of 326 capacitor manufacturing workers who had participated in an epidemiological study relating health abnormalities to exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). For a subsample of the cohort (n = 164) in which occupational histories were obtained twice (in 1976 and 1979), reliability of cumulative exposure to PCBs ranged from 93.6% for the early PCB period (1947-70) to 95.7% for the late PCB period (1971-6). These respective reliabilities were lower, however, for workers who changed jobs often. Workers above the median value of a weighted job change index had early and late reliabilities of 89.9% and 83.6% respectively. Reliability is a relevant factor when calculating power or sample size during the planning stage of epidemiological studies, for interpretation or adjustment of estimates in the analysis stage, or for determination of study feasibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9254,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Medicine","volume":"50 9","pages":"822-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/oem.50.9.822","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Industrial Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.50.9.822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

An investigation was conducted to examine the reliability (reproducibility) of self reported occupational histories obtained from a cohort of 326 capacitor manufacturing workers who had participated in an epidemiological study relating health abnormalities to exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). For a subsample of the cohort (n = 164) in which occupational histories were obtained twice (in 1976 and 1979), reliability of cumulative exposure to PCBs ranged from 93.6% for the early PCB period (1947-70) to 95.7% for the late PCB period (1971-6). These respective reliabilities were lower, however, for workers who changed jobs often. Workers above the median value of a weighted job change index had early and late reliabilities of 89.9% and 83.6% respectively. Reliability is a relevant factor when calculating power or sample size during the planning stage of epidemiological studies, for interpretation or adjustment of estimates in the analysis stage, or for determination of study feasibility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一组接触多氯联苯的工人自我报告工作经历的可靠性分析。
进行了一项调查,以检验326名电容器制造工人自我报告的职业史的可靠性(可重复性),这些工人参加了一项与接触多氯联苯(pcb)有关的健康异常的流行病学研究。对于该队列(n = 164)中两次获得职业史(1976年和1979年)的子样本,多氯联苯累积暴露的可靠性范围从早期多氯联苯时期(1947- 1970年)的93.6%到晚期多氯联苯时期(1971- 1976年)的95.7%。然而,对于经常换工作的人来说,这些各自的可靠性较低。在加权工作变动指数中位数以上的工人,其早期可靠性和后期可靠性分别为89.9%和83.6%。在流行病学研究的规划阶段计算能力或样本量时,在分析阶段解释或调整估计时,或在确定研究可行性时,可靠性是一个相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occupational health for all? Dust exposure and mortality in chrysotile mining, 1910-75. 1980. The 1891-1920 birth cohort of Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: mortality 1976-88. Respiratory health effects of carbon black: a survey of European carbon black workers. Incidence of cancer among welders of mild steel and other shipyard workers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1