Subcellular mechanism of the species difference in the contractile response of ventricular myocytes to endothelin-1.

Cardioscience Pub Date : 1993-09-01
F Del Monte, J R Mynett, P H Sugden, P A Poole-Wilson, S E Harding
{"title":"Subcellular mechanism of the species difference in the contractile response of ventricular myocytes to endothelin-1.","authors":"F Del Monte,&nbsp;J R Mynett,&nbsp;P H Sugden,&nbsp;P A Poole-Wilson,&nbsp;S E Harding","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the experiments was to compare the effects of endothelin and alpha-adrenoceptor stimulation on the contraction and inositol phosphate turnover of cardiomyocytes enzymatically isolated from rat and guinea-pig hearts. The effects of agonists on the contraction amplitude of warmed (32 degrees C), electrically stimulated (0.5 Hz) myocytes was recorded using a video-edge detection system. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis was measured in suspensions of myocytes prelabelled with myo-[2(-3)H]-inositol. A doubling of contraction amplitude was observed in rat ventricular myocytes in response to maximally effective concentrations of either endothelin-1 (10 nM) or phenylephrine (1 mM). In rat myocytes, prazosin prevented the effect of phenylephrine but not the effect of endothelin-1. Reversal of the maximal inotropic effect of endothelin was slow (halftime for reversal 11.5 +/- 4.5 min) compared with phenylephrine (3.4 +/- 1.1 min). Endothelin (10 nM) added at the peak effect of phenylephrine produced no further increase in contraction amplitude. The half-time for the reversal of the effect of phenylephrine plus endothelin in these experiments was not significantly different from that with endothelin alone (12.8 +/- 4.0 min). This indicates that phenylephrine did not interact with endothelin binding. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis was increased in rat myocytes by either endothelin or phenylephrine. In guinea-pig myocytes, endothelin-1 stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis but did not induce an inotropic response, whereas phenylephrine gave neither an increase in phosphoinositide hydrolysis nor an inotropic effect. We conclude that the observations in rat myocytes are consistent with different receptors for endothelin-1 and phenylephrine, but a common final pathway through the inositol phosphate system for the inotropic effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":9629,"journal":{"name":"Cardioscience","volume":"4 3","pages":"185-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardioscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the experiments was to compare the effects of endothelin and alpha-adrenoceptor stimulation on the contraction and inositol phosphate turnover of cardiomyocytes enzymatically isolated from rat and guinea-pig hearts. The effects of agonists on the contraction amplitude of warmed (32 degrees C), electrically stimulated (0.5 Hz) myocytes was recorded using a video-edge detection system. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis was measured in suspensions of myocytes prelabelled with myo-[2(-3)H]-inositol. A doubling of contraction amplitude was observed in rat ventricular myocytes in response to maximally effective concentrations of either endothelin-1 (10 nM) or phenylephrine (1 mM). In rat myocytes, prazosin prevented the effect of phenylephrine but not the effect of endothelin-1. Reversal of the maximal inotropic effect of endothelin was slow (halftime for reversal 11.5 +/- 4.5 min) compared with phenylephrine (3.4 +/- 1.1 min). Endothelin (10 nM) added at the peak effect of phenylephrine produced no further increase in contraction amplitude. The half-time for the reversal of the effect of phenylephrine plus endothelin in these experiments was not significantly different from that with endothelin alone (12.8 +/- 4.0 min). This indicates that phenylephrine did not interact with endothelin binding. Phosphoinositide hydrolysis was increased in rat myocytes by either endothelin or phenylephrine. In guinea-pig myocytes, endothelin-1 stimulated phosphoinositide hydrolysis but did not induce an inotropic response, whereas phenylephrine gave neither an increase in phosphoinositide hydrolysis nor an inotropic effect. We conclude that the observations in rat myocytes are consistent with different receptors for endothelin-1 and phenylephrine, but a common final pathway through the inositol phosphate system for the inotropic effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心室肌细胞对内皮素-1收缩反应的亚细胞机制。
本实验旨在比较内皮素和α -肾上腺素受体刺激对酶解大鼠和豚鼠心肌细胞收缩和肌醇磷酸转化的影响。使用视频边缘检测系统记录激动剂对加热(32℃)、电刺激(0.5 Hz)肌细胞收缩幅度的影响。用肌-[2(-3)H]-肌醇预标记肌细胞悬液,测定磷酸肌肽水解。在最大有效浓度的内皮素-1 (10 nM)或苯肾上腺素(1 mM)下,大鼠心室肌细胞收缩幅度加倍。在大鼠肌细胞中,哌唑嗪能抑制苯肾上腺素的作用,但不能抑制内皮素-1的作用。与苯肾上腺素(3.4 +/- 1.1 min)相比,内皮素的最大肌力效应逆转较慢(逆转的中场时间为11.5 +/- 4.5 min)。内皮素(10 nM)的加入对肾上腺素的收缩幅度没有进一步增加。在这些实验中,苯肾上腺素加内皮素的作用逆转的半衰期与内皮素单独使用的效果逆转的半衰期(12.8 +/- 4.0 min)没有显著差异。这表明苯肾上腺素不与内皮素结合相互作用。内皮素和苯肾上腺素均能增加大鼠肌细胞磷酸肌肽的水解。在豚鼠肌细胞中,内皮素-1刺激磷酸肌肽水解,但不诱导肌力反应,而苯肾上腺素既不增加磷酸肌肽水解,也不增加肌力作用。我们的结论是,在大鼠肌细胞中观察到的结果与内皮素-1和苯肾上腺素的不同受体一致,但通过肌醇磷酸系统的共同最终途径来发挥肌力作用。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cellular basis of ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats. Incorporation of cholesterol oxidation products into cell lipids and their influence on the proliferation of cultured cardiomyocytes. Assessment of subrenal banding of the abdominal aorta as a method of inducing cardiac hypertrophy in the guinea pig. The effects of distension of the stomach and the descending colon on phasic coronary blood flow in the anesthetized pig. The functional and metabolic responses of the heart to catecholamines are attenuated in diabetic rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1