[Electromyogram measuring method for low back load evaluation of handling weight and forward bending posture].

A Seo, H Udo, F Yoshinaga
{"title":"[Electromyogram measuring method for low back load evaluation of handling weight and forward bending posture].","authors":"A Seo,&nbsp;H Udo,&nbsp;F Yoshinaga","doi":"10.1539/joh1959.35.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to establish a measuring method of electromyogram (EMG) to evaluate the low back load by handling weight and forward bending angle. EMG at Th5-6, Th8-9, Th11-12, L1-2 and L3-4 were measured in ten male subjects. The handling weight was changed at 0, 10, 20 and 30 kg, and the forward bending angle was changed at 0, 30, 60 and 90 degree. The following results were obtained: 1) EMG increased according to the handling weight at all forward bending angles. The increasing rate of EMG at Th5-6 was larger than that at L1-2 or L3-4. Thus, EMG at higher position such as Th5-6 was found to be appropriate to evaluate handling weight-load. 2) The effect of forward bending angle was different by handling weight. EMG at L1-2 and L3-4 increased according to forward bending angle when the handling weight was 0 kg or 10 kg and when the forward bending angle was not greater than 60 degree. However, when the handling weight was 20 kg or 30 kg, EMG and forward bending angle did not show a simple proportional relationship. Thus, EMG at L1-2 or L3-4 could be used to evaluate posture load when the handling weight was light and the bending angle was not so large. However, it was difficult to use EMG to evaluate posture load when the forward bending angle was large or the handling weight was heavy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21500,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo igaku. Japanese journal of industrial health","volume":"35 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1539/joh1959.35.19","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo igaku. Japanese journal of industrial health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/joh1959.35.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

In order to establish a measuring method of electromyogram (EMG) to evaluate the low back load by handling weight and forward bending angle. EMG at Th5-6, Th8-9, Th11-12, L1-2 and L3-4 were measured in ten male subjects. The handling weight was changed at 0, 10, 20 and 30 kg, and the forward bending angle was changed at 0, 30, 60 and 90 degree. The following results were obtained: 1) EMG increased according to the handling weight at all forward bending angles. The increasing rate of EMG at Th5-6 was larger than that at L1-2 or L3-4. Thus, EMG at higher position such as Th5-6 was found to be appropriate to evaluate handling weight-load. 2) The effect of forward bending angle was different by handling weight. EMG at L1-2 and L3-4 increased according to forward bending angle when the handling weight was 0 kg or 10 kg and when the forward bending angle was not greater than 60 degree. However, when the handling weight was 20 kg or 30 kg, EMG and forward bending angle did not show a simple proportional relationship. Thus, EMG at L1-2 or L3-4 could be used to evaluate posture load when the handling weight was light and the bending angle was not so large. However, it was difficult to use EMG to evaluate posture load when the forward bending angle was large or the handling weight was heavy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[低背负荷评价搬运重量和前屈姿势的肌电图测量方法]。
为了建立一种通过搬运重量和前屈角度来评价低背负荷的肌电图测量方法。测量10例男性受试者Th5-6、Th8-9、Th11-12、L1-2和L3-4的肌电图。搬运重量分别为0、10、20、30 kg,前弯角度分别为0、30、60、90度。结果表明:1)各前屈角度下肌电图随搬运重量的增加而增加。Th5-6肌电的增加速率大于L1-2和L3-4。因此,在较高的位置,如Th5-6肌电图被发现是合适的评估搬运重量负荷。2)前弯角度的影响因搬运重量的不同而不同。当搬运重量为0 kg或10 kg,前屈角度不大于60度时,L1-2和L3-4肌电图随前屈角度的增加而增加。然而,当搬运重量为20 kg或30 kg时,肌电图与前屈角度并没有呈现简单的比例关系。因此,在搬运重量较轻且弯曲角度不太大的情况下,L1-2或L3-4肌电图可用于评估姿势负荷。然而,当前屈角度较大或搬运重量较大时,肌电图难以评估姿势负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[HCV antibody positive rate observed in periodic checkup in Kitakyushu]. [One opinion on the handling of problem drinkers within corporations--based on three actual cases]. [SGOMSEC and international cooperation]. Quantitative assessment of stressors and stress reaction: a review. A simple apparatus using inclinometer for monitoring working postures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1