Moclobemide and sertraline in the treatment of depressive disorders: a comparative study.

Acta psychiatrica Belgica Pub Date : 1995-05-01
S Orsel Donbak, M H Turkçapar, E Z Ozturk Kiliç, N Demirergi, A Akdemir, A Sirin, M H Ozbay
{"title":"Moclobemide and sertraline in the treatment of depressive disorders: a comparative study.","authors":"S Orsel Donbak,&nbsp;M H Turkçapar,&nbsp;E Z Ozturk Kiliç,&nbsp;N Demirergi,&nbsp;A Akdemir,&nbsp;A Sirin,&nbsp;M H Ozbay","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide and sertraline were compared in a 13 week trial on 55 depressive patients. Patients were diagnosed according to DSM-III-R criteria using SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R). The study group was composed of 48 patients with major depression and 7 with minor depression. Patients were randomized in two drug groups and raters were blind to the drugs patients used. HDRS and CGI were used to assess the change in depressive symptoms. Twenty seven patients received moclobemide and 28 patients received sertraline. The dose of moclobemide used was 300-600 mg/day and that of sertraline was 50-200 mg/day. At the end of 13 weeks mean drop in HDRS for the overall group was 14.78 and the response rate calculated as percentage of patients showing a 50% drop in HDRS score was 77.8. The response rate was 76.5% for moclobemide and 78.5% for sertraline. The difference was not significant. The side effects were assessed by using UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. The most three observed side effects were dry mouth, headache and insomnia.</p>","PeriodicalId":75415,"journal":{"name":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","volume":"95 3","pages":"139-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta psychiatrica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of moclobemide and sertraline were compared in a 13 week trial on 55 depressive patients. Patients were diagnosed according to DSM-III-R criteria using SCID (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R). The study group was composed of 48 patients with major depression and 7 with minor depression. Patients were randomized in two drug groups and raters were blind to the drugs patients used. HDRS and CGI were used to assess the change in depressive symptoms. Twenty seven patients received moclobemide and 28 patients received sertraline. The dose of moclobemide used was 300-600 mg/day and that of sertraline was 50-200 mg/day. At the end of 13 weeks mean drop in HDRS for the overall group was 14.78 and the response rate calculated as percentage of patients showing a 50% drop in HDRS score was 77.8. The response rate was 76.5% for moclobemide and 78.5% for sertraline. The difference was not significant. The side effects were assessed by using UKU Side Effects Rating Scale. The most three observed side effects were dry mouth, headache and insomnia.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莫氯贝胺与舍曲林治疗抑郁症的比较研究。
对55例抑郁症患者进行了为期13周的莫氯比胺和舍曲林的疗效和耐受性比较。根据DSM-III-R标准使用SCID (DSM-III-R结构化临床访谈)对患者进行诊断。研究组由48例重度抑郁症患者和7例轻度抑郁症患者组成。患者被随机分为两个药物组,评分员对患者使用的药物不知情。采用HDRS和CGI评估抑郁症状的变化。莫氯比胺27例,舍曲林28例。莫氯比胺剂量300 ~ 600mg /d,舍曲林剂量50 ~ 200mg /d。在13周结束时,整个组的HDRS平均下降为14.78,以HDRS评分下降50%的患者百分比计算的缓解率为77.8。莫氯比胺的有效率为76.5%,舍曲林的有效率为78.5%。差异不显著。采用UKU副作用评定量表对毒副作用进行评定。观察到的最常见的三种副作用是口干、头痛和失眠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Problems of process-efficiency studies in psychotherapy. [Problem of indications in psychotherapy]. Costs and benefits of psychotherapy. [Psychotherapy in the institutional environment]. [Psychotherapy in children and youths].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1