Physiological doses of [Ile5]- and [Val5]-Angiotensin II fail to increase plasma catecholamines at the peak pressor response in rats.

D G Butler, D A Butt
{"title":"Physiological doses of [Ile5]- and [Val5]-Angiotensin II fail to increase plasma catecholamines at the peak pressor response in rats.","authors":"D G Butler,&nbsp;D A Butt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pressor responses to [Ile5]-Angiotensin II and [Val5]-Angiotensin II were measured following single intravenous doses of 0.0075, 0.075, 0.375, 0.75 and 7.5 micrograms/kg b.w. in anesthetised rats. [Val5]-Angiotensin II was significantly (10 per cent) more potent than [Ile5]-angiotensin II when log dose was plotted against the increase in carotid arterial pressure. Doses of 0.075 microgram/kg b.w. or more of each of the two peptides gave a full pressor response within 30 seconds. However, only at the highest and, probably, nonphysiological dose of [Ile5]-Angiotensin II (7.5 micrograms/kg b.w.) was there a significant increase in noradrenaline and adrenaline concentrations measured using a radioenzymatic assay. [Val5]-Angiotensin II was more potent than [Ile5]-Angiotensin II insofar as plasma noradrenaline increased significantly (p < 0.05) following doses of 0.75 and 7.5 micrograms/kg b.w.; adrenaline at the higher dose only. Plasma dopamine was unresponsive to both peptides.</p>","PeriodicalId":8166,"journal":{"name":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","volume":"329 2","pages":"272-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pressor responses to [Ile5]-Angiotensin II and [Val5]-Angiotensin II were measured following single intravenous doses of 0.0075, 0.075, 0.375, 0.75 and 7.5 micrograms/kg b.w. in anesthetised rats. [Val5]-Angiotensin II was significantly (10 per cent) more potent than [Ile5]-angiotensin II when log dose was plotted against the increase in carotid arterial pressure. Doses of 0.075 microgram/kg b.w. or more of each of the two peptides gave a full pressor response within 30 seconds. However, only at the highest and, probably, nonphysiological dose of [Ile5]-Angiotensin II (7.5 micrograms/kg b.w.) was there a significant increase in noradrenaline and adrenaline concentrations measured using a radioenzymatic assay. [Val5]-Angiotensin II was more potent than [Ile5]-Angiotensin II insofar as plasma noradrenaline increased significantly (p < 0.05) following doses of 0.75 and 7.5 micrograms/kg b.w.; adrenaline at the higher dose only. Plasma dopamine was unresponsive to both peptides.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理剂量的[Ile5]-和[Val5]-血管紧张素II不能增加大鼠血压反应峰值时的血浆儿茶酚胺。
在麻醉大鼠单次静脉注射剂量分别为0.0075、0.075、0.375、0.75和7.5微克/千克体重时,测量[Ile5]-血管紧张素II和[Val5]-血管紧张素II的升压反应。当对数剂量与颈动脉压的增加相关时,[Val5]-血管紧张素II的效力明显(10%)高于[Ile5]-血管紧张素II。每公斤体重0.075微克或更高剂量的两种肽在30秒内产生完全的升压反应。然而,只有在最高且可能是非生理剂量的[Ile5]-血管紧张素II(7.5微克/千克体重)时,用放射酶测定的去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素浓度才会显著增加。[Val5]-血管紧张素II比[Ile5]-血管紧张素II更有效,在0.75和7.5微克/kg b.w后血浆去甲肾上腺素显著增加(p < 0.05);只有高剂量的肾上腺素。血浆多巴胺对两种多肽均无反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growth and metabolism. Alteration of the cardiac effects of midazolam by hypothermia in rat isolated atria. K+ channel-opening action contributes to the preventive effects of nicorandil on U46619-induced vasoconstriction of canine large coronary arteries in vivo. Effects of mefloquine on Ca2+ uptake and release by dog brain microsomes. Observation of high and low molecular weight inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme in rat lung.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1