[Efferent spinal evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in dog].

Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 1995-10-01
H Kajihara
{"title":"[Efferent spinal evoked potentials by transcranial magnetic stimulation in dog].","authors":"H Kajihara","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have investigated the utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation for spinal cord monitoring, experimentally in dog. Experiment 1. Spinal cord potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TCMS) were recorded in the epidural space, using a bipolar mapping spinal electrode, and compared with potentials by transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES). Experiment 2. The effect of lateral compression on the spinal cord was observed, recording from 3 bipolar electrodes attached to the bilateral and dorsal midline epidural space. Experiment 3. The potentials evoked by TCMS were compared with the afferent potentials evoked by spinal electrical stimulation after lateral compression of the spinal cord. Efferent spinal cord potentials evoked by TCMS consisted of a 1 st component of high amplitude and short latency and a later polyphasic component with prolonged latency. The 1 st component was stable, and not affected by intravenous anesthesia. The potentials evoked by TCMS were similar to the potentials evoked by mild TCES, and the mean latency of the 1 st component by TCMS was very similar to that by mild TCES. After releasing the lateral compression, the amplitude recorded from the contralateral side of the spinal cord showed better recovery than that from the compression side. In experiment 3, for both potentials after good recovery, the latency was almost completely normalized, but the amplitude gradually decreased after two days. When there was relatively good recovery in the potentials by magnetic stimulation, the hind limbs resumed normal function. However when there was poor recovery in the potentials, the hind limbs showed a poor functional recovery. From these findings, we concluded that the potentials evoked by TCMS seem to reflect the function of the posterolateral portion of the spinal cord. These potentials were therefore a good indicator for monitoring the motor function of the spinal cord.</p>","PeriodicalId":19640,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi","volume":"69 10","pages":"1050-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We have investigated the utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation for spinal cord monitoring, experimentally in dog. Experiment 1. Spinal cord potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TCMS) were recorded in the epidural space, using a bipolar mapping spinal electrode, and compared with potentials by transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES). Experiment 2. The effect of lateral compression on the spinal cord was observed, recording from 3 bipolar electrodes attached to the bilateral and dorsal midline epidural space. Experiment 3. The potentials evoked by TCMS were compared with the afferent potentials evoked by spinal electrical stimulation after lateral compression of the spinal cord. Efferent spinal cord potentials evoked by TCMS consisted of a 1 st component of high amplitude and short latency and a later polyphasic component with prolonged latency. The 1 st component was stable, and not affected by intravenous anesthesia. The potentials evoked by TCMS were similar to the potentials evoked by mild TCES, and the mean latency of the 1 st component by TCMS was very similar to that by mild TCES. After releasing the lateral compression, the amplitude recorded from the contralateral side of the spinal cord showed better recovery than that from the compression side. In experiment 3, for both potentials after good recovery, the latency was almost completely normalized, but the amplitude gradually decreased after two days. When there was relatively good recovery in the potentials by magnetic stimulation, the hind limbs resumed normal function. However when there was poor recovery in the potentials, the hind limbs showed a poor functional recovery. From these findings, we concluded that the potentials evoked by TCMS seem to reflect the function of the posterolateral portion of the spinal cord. These potentials were therefore a good indicator for monitoring the motor function of the spinal cord.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[经颅磁刺激犬的脊髓传出诱发电位]。
我们研究了经颅磁刺激在狗脊髓监测中的应用。实验1。采用双极定向脊髓电极在硬膜外空间记录经颅磁刺激(TCMS)诱发的脊髓电位,并与经颅电刺激(TCES)诱发的脊髓电位进行比较。实验2。通过连接双侧和背侧中线硬膜外间隙的3个双极电极,观察脊髓侧压对脊髓的影响。实验3。比较了脊髓侧压后TCMS诱发的传入电位与脊髓电刺激诱发的传入电位。TCMS诱发的脊髓传出电位由高振幅、短潜伏期的第1分量和后潜伏期较长的多相分量组成。第1组分稳定,不受静脉麻醉影响。TCMS诱发的电位与轻度TCES诱发的电位相似,且TCMS诱发的第1组分的平均潜伏期与轻度TCES非常相似。解除侧压迫后,从脊髓对侧记录的振幅比从受压侧记录的振幅恢复得更好。在实验3中,对于恢复良好的两个电位,潜伏期几乎完全归一化,但振幅在两天后逐渐下降。当磁刺激电位恢复较好时,后肢功能恢复正常。而当后肢电位恢复较差时,后肢功能恢复较差。根据这些发现,我们得出结论,TCMS诱发的电位似乎反映了脊髓后外侧部分的功能。因此,这些电位是监测脊髓运动功能的良好指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Orthotic treatment]. [20 years' experience with Charnley low friction arthroplasty--striving for durability and future prospects]. [Facts and concepts in bone and soft tissue tumor pathology]. [Treatment of proximal humeral fractures]. [Reconstruction of efferent and afferent innervation of biceps muscle by the intercostal nerve].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1