Combining research, advocacy, and education: the methods of the Grandparent Caregiver Study.

K M Roe, M Minkler, F F Saunders
{"title":"Combining research, advocacy, and education: the methods of the Grandparent Caregiver Study.","authors":"K M Roe,&nbsp;M Minkler,&nbsp;F F Saunders","doi":"10.1177/109019819502200404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article presents a case study of the effective synergy of health education inquiry, community collaboration, and policy advocacy. Using the Grandparent Caregiver Study as the example, the authors focus on key methodological decisions that enabled them to incorporate research, education, and advocacy activities into an ever-growing project on a modest budget. The study itself centered on two in-depth interviews with each of 71 African American grandmothers raising young grandchildren due to the crack cocaine epidemic in Oakland, California. The case study demonstrates ways in which health education research can increase the efficacy of individuals and disenfranchised groups to define problems, voice their concerns, and advocate for more just and healthy public policies. Through discussion of the authors' methods and activities, they suggest strategies through which research participants, service providers, and policymakers can work together to bring a new issue to the policy arena through a collaborative and empowering research process.</p>","PeriodicalId":77155,"journal":{"name":"Health education quarterly","volume":"22 4","pages":"458-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/109019819502200404","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819502200404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

This article presents a case study of the effective synergy of health education inquiry, community collaboration, and policy advocacy. Using the Grandparent Caregiver Study as the example, the authors focus on key methodological decisions that enabled them to incorporate research, education, and advocacy activities into an ever-growing project on a modest budget. The study itself centered on two in-depth interviews with each of 71 African American grandmothers raising young grandchildren due to the crack cocaine epidemic in Oakland, California. The case study demonstrates ways in which health education research can increase the efficacy of individuals and disenfranchised groups to define problems, voice their concerns, and advocate for more just and healthy public policies. Through discussion of the authors' methods and activities, they suggest strategies through which research participants, service providers, and policymakers can work together to bring a new issue to the policy arena through a collaborative and empowering research process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合研究、宣传和教育:祖父母照顾者研究的方法。
本文提出健康教育调查、社区合作和政策倡导有效协同的案例研究。以“祖父母照顾者研究”为例,作者关注关键的方法决策,使他们能够在适度的预算下将研究、教育和宣传活动纳入一个不断增长的项目。这项研究本身以两次深入采访为中心,采访了71位非洲裔美国祖母中的每一位,这些祖母由于加利福尼亚州奥克兰的可卡因流行而抚养年幼的孙子。该案例研究表明,健康教育研究可以提高个人和被剥夺权利群体确定问题、表达他们的关切和倡导更公正和健康的公共政策的效率。通过讨论作者的方法和活动,他们提出了一些策略,通过这些策略,研究参与者、服务提供者和决策者可以共同努力,通过协作和授权的研究过程将一个新问题带到政策领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of multiple equations for predicting preventive oral health behaviors. Using the theory of reasoned action (TRA) to understand the decision to use condoms in an STD clinic population. Adolescent sexual health. Program: N'go Doo Dee Family Support Initiative. Program: Responsible Alcohol and Tobacco Sales Training (RATS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1