Cellular and topical in vivo inflammatory murine models in the evaluation of inhibitors of phospholipase A2.

K B Glaser, M L Sung, D A Hartman, Y W Lock, J Bauer, T Walter, R P Carlson
{"title":"Cellular and topical in vivo inflammatory murine models in the evaluation of inhibitors of phospholipase A2.","authors":"K B Glaser,&nbsp;M L Sung,&nbsp;D A Hartman,&nbsp;Y W Lock,&nbsp;J Bauer,&nbsp;T Walter,&nbsp;R P Carlson","doi":"10.1159/000211361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several novel inhibitors of human synovial fluid phospholipase A2 (HSF-PLA2) were evaluated in cellular models of inflammatory mediator release (murine macrophage and human neutrophil) and topical in vivo inflammatory skin models in mice to ascertain the scope of effects which might be observed for PLA2 inhibitors. Potent inhibition of HSF-PLA2 in vitro can be observed with compounds such as scalaradial and ellagic acid, which both have IC50 values of 0.02 microM (using autoclaved [3H]-arachidonic-acid (AA)-labelled Escherichia coli membranes as substrate). Luffariellolide, a manoalide analog, and aristolochic acid are less potent (IC50 = 5 and 46 microM, respectively) in this assay. An interesting observation is that ellagic acid in cellular assays does not inhibit macrophage eicosanoid production and only 30% inhibition of PAF biosynthesis can be obtained at 50 microM in the human neutrophil. Possibly due to its irreversible mechanism of action, scalaradial retained its potent activity in both the macrophage (IC50 for PGE2 production = 0.05 microM) and neutrophil assays (IC50 for PAF biosynthesis = 1 microM). Aristolochic acid is active in these cellular assays (macrophage IC50 = 2.5 microM and neutrophil IC50 = 100 microM), but is consistently less active than either scalaradial or luffariellolide. The relative potencies of these compounds were determined in several murine in vivo inflammatory models such as oxazolone contact hypersensitivity, AA-induced ear edema and phorbol ester (PMA)-induced ear edema. In the mouse model of oxazolone contact hypersensitivity, these PLA2 inhibitors have little effect (< or = 30% inhibition at 400 micrograms/ear) with scalaradial and luffariellolide being less effective than either aristolochic or ellagic acid. PMA-induced ear edema was effectively inhibited by scalaradial, luffariellolide and aristolochic acid (ED50 = 70, 50 and 50 micrograms/ear, respectively) whereas ellagic acid was less effective (ED50 = 230 micrograms/ear). In AA-induced ear edema, these PLA2 inhibitors had minimal effects, as would be expected for compounds which inhibit PLA2. These results, especially those of ellagic acid, suggest that caution should be taken in the extrapolation of potency against a purified human extracellular type PLA2 to the scope of activities these compounds might have in the cellular and in vivo models. The consistency of scalaradial and luffariellolide may be inherent to their irreversible mechanism of action, which is a factor to be accounted for in the extrapolation of enzyme data to cellular and in vivo models.</p>","PeriodicalId":21596,"journal":{"name":"Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society","volume":"8 6","pages":"300-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000211361","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000211361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Several novel inhibitors of human synovial fluid phospholipase A2 (HSF-PLA2) were evaluated in cellular models of inflammatory mediator release (murine macrophage and human neutrophil) and topical in vivo inflammatory skin models in mice to ascertain the scope of effects which might be observed for PLA2 inhibitors. Potent inhibition of HSF-PLA2 in vitro can be observed with compounds such as scalaradial and ellagic acid, which both have IC50 values of 0.02 microM (using autoclaved [3H]-arachidonic-acid (AA)-labelled Escherichia coli membranes as substrate). Luffariellolide, a manoalide analog, and aristolochic acid are less potent (IC50 = 5 and 46 microM, respectively) in this assay. An interesting observation is that ellagic acid in cellular assays does not inhibit macrophage eicosanoid production and only 30% inhibition of PAF biosynthesis can be obtained at 50 microM in the human neutrophil. Possibly due to its irreversible mechanism of action, scalaradial retained its potent activity in both the macrophage (IC50 for PGE2 production = 0.05 microM) and neutrophil assays (IC50 for PAF biosynthesis = 1 microM). Aristolochic acid is active in these cellular assays (macrophage IC50 = 2.5 microM and neutrophil IC50 = 100 microM), but is consistently less active than either scalaradial or luffariellolide. The relative potencies of these compounds were determined in several murine in vivo inflammatory models such as oxazolone contact hypersensitivity, AA-induced ear edema and phorbol ester (PMA)-induced ear edema. In the mouse model of oxazolone contact hypersensitivity, these PLA2 inhibitors have little effect (< or = 30% inhibition at 400 micrograms/ear) with scalaradial and luffariellolide being less effective than either aristolochic or ellagic acid. PMA-induced ear edema was effectively inhibited by scalaradial, luffariellolide and aristolochic acid (ED50 = 70, 50 and 50 micrograms/ear, respectively) whereas ellagic acid was less effective (ED50 = 230 micrograms/ear). In AA-induced ear edema, these PLA2 inhibitors had minimal effects, as would be expected for compounds which inhibit PLA2. These results, especially those of ellagic acid, suggest that caution should be taken in the extrapolation of potency against a purified human extracellular type PLA2 to the scope of activities these compounds might have in the cellular and in vivo models. The consistency of scalaradial and luffariellolide may be inherent to their irreversible mechanism of action, which is a factor to be accounted for in the extrapolation of enzyme data to cellular and in vivo models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价磷脂酶A2抑制剂的细胞和局部体内炎症小鼠模型。
几种新的人滑膜液磷脂酶A2 (HSF-PLA2)抑制剂在炎症介质释放的细胞模型(小鼠巨噬细胞和人中性粒细胞)和小鼠局部体内炎症皮肤模型中进行了评估,以确定PLA2抑制剂可能观察到的作用范围。在体外可以观察到对HSF-PLA2的有效抑制作用,如标有[3H]-花生四烯酸(AA)标记的大肠杆菌膜,其IC50值均为0.02微米。在这个实验中,马醛酸类似物马兜铃内酯和马兜铃酸的作用较弱(IC50分别为5和46微米)。一个有趣的观察结果是,在细胞实验中,鞣花酸不会抑制巨噬细胞类二十烷酸的产生,在人中性粒细胞中,在50微米时,PAF的生物合成只有30%的抑制作用。可能是由于其不可逆的作用机制,scalaradial在巨噬细胞(产生PGE2的IC50 = 0.05微米)和中性粒细胞(生物合成PAF的IC50 = 1微米)中都保持了其有效的活性。马兜铃酸在这些细胞试验中具有活性(巨噬细胞IC50 = 2.5 μ m,中性粒细胞IC50 = 100 μ m),但其活性始终低于标scalaradial或luffariellolide。这些化合物的相对效力在几种小鼠体内炎症模型中进行了测定,如恶唑酮接触过敏、aa诱导的耳部水肿和酚酯(PMA)诱导的耳部水肿。在恶唑酮接触性超敏小鼠模型中,这些PLA2抑制剂几乎没有作用(在400 μ g /耳时抑制作用<或= 30%),黄芩苷和丝瓜内酯的效果不及马兜铃酸或鞣花酸。黄芩苷、丝虫草内酯和马兜铃酸(ED50分别为70、50和50微克/耳)对pma诱导的耳部水肿有明显的抑制作用,而鞣花酸(ED50 = 230微克/耳)的抑制作用较弱。在aa诱导的耳部水肿中,这些PLA2抑制剂的作用最小,正如预期的那样,抑制PLA2的化合物。这些结果,特别是鞣花酸的结果,表明在推断针对纯化的人细胞外型PLA2的效力时,应谨慎考虑这些化合物在细胞和体内模型中可能具有的活性范围。标侧和丝瓜内酯的一致性可能是其不可逆作用机制所固有的,这是将酶数据外推到细胞和体内模型时要考虑的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pro-inflammatory cytokine cascade in human plucked hair. Immunological gene therapy approaches for malignant melanoma. 1. Tumor-immunological background. A skin equivalent model for cosmetological trials: an in vitro efficacy study of a new biopeptide. Bisindolylmaleimide protein-kinase-C inhibitors delay the decline in DNA synthesis in mouse hair follicle organ cultures. Cyclosporin G inhibits proliferation of A431 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner comparable to cyclosporin A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1