Resting energy expenditure in patients with cirrhosis of the liver measured by indirect calorimetry, anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Experientia Pub Date : 1996-06-15 DOI:10.1007/BF01969735
M Waluga, B Zahorska-Markiewicz, M Janusz, Z Słabiak, A Chełmicka
{"title":"Resting energy expenditure in patients with cirrhosis of the liver measured by indirect calorimetry, anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis.","authors":"M Waluga,&nbsp;B Zahorska-Markiewicz,&nbsp;M Janusz,&nbsp;Z Słabiak,&nbsp;A Chełmicka","doi":"10.1007/BF01969735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Energy expenditure was investigated in 15 patients with liver cirrhosis and 20 healthy controls by three methods: indirect calorimetry, anthropometry using the Harris-Benedict equation and bioelectrical impedance analysis. The energy expenditure was expressed in kcal/day, kcal/kg BW/day (BW - body weight), kcal/kg LBM/day (LBM - lean body mass, derived by bioelectrical impedance analysis) or in kcal/m2/day. We did not find statistical differences between values of resting energy expenditure obtained in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and healthy controls whichever method we used. We also did not find statistical differences between values obtained by indirect calorimetry, anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. There was a significant correlation between indirect calorimetry and anthropometry in both groups. We found significant correlations between indirect calorimetry and anthropometry, and between indirect calorimetry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, in the control group only. We can conclude that (1) resting energy expenditure of patients with cirrhosis of the liver is not changed when compared with healthy controls, and (2) bioelectrical impedance is a useful method to calculate body composition from which energy expenditure is derived; however, it gives an appropriate result only in healthy people, and only approximate values in patients with cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12087,"journal":{"name":"Experientia","volume":"52 6","pages":"591-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01969735","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experientia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01969735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Energy expenditure was investigated in 15 patients with liver cirrhosis and 20 healthy controls by three methods: indirect calorimetry, anthropometry using the Harris-Benedict equation and bioelectrical impedance analysis. The energy expenditure was expressed in kcal/day, kcal/kg BW/day (BW - body weight), kcal/kg LBM/day (LBM - lean body mass, derived by bioelectrical impedance analysis) or in kcal/m2/day. We did not find statistical differences between values of resting energy expenditure obtained in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and healthy controls whichever method we used. We also did not find statistical differences between values obtained by indirect calorimetry, anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis. There was a significant correlation between indirect calorimetry and anthropometry in both groups. We found significant correlations between indirect calorimetry and anthropometry, and between indirect calorimetry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, in the control group only. We can conclude that (1) resting energy expenditure of patients with cirrhosis of the liver is not changed when compared with healthy controls, and (2) bioelectrical impedance is a useful method to calculate body composition from which energy expenditure is derived; however, it gives an appropriate result only in healthy people, and only approximate values in patients with cirrhosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用间接量热法、人体测量法和生物电阻抗分析法测量肝硬化患者静息能量消耗。
采用间接量热法、Harris-Benedict方程人体测量法和生物电阻抗分析法对15例肝硬化患者和20例健康对照者的能量消耗进行了调查。能量消耗以kcal/day、kcal/kg BW/day (BW -体重)、kcal/kg LBM/day (LBM -瘦体重,由生物电阻抗分析得出)或kcal/m2/day表示。无论采用何种方法,我们都没有发现肝硬化患者和健康对照组的静息能量消耗值有统计学差异。我们也没有发现间接量热法、人体测量法和生物电阻抗分析法之间的统计差异。两组患者的间接量热与人体测量均有显著相关性。我们发现,仅在对照组中,间接量热法与人体测量法、间接量热法与生物电阻抗分析之间存在显著相关性。我们可以得出结论:(1)肝硬化患者的静息能量消耗与健康对照组相比没有变化,(2)生物电阻抗是计算身体成分的有用方法,从中可以得出能量消耗;然而,它只在健康人群中给出合适的结果,在肝硬化患者中只给出近似值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunogenetics. Cytosolic factors in mitochondrial protein import. Regulated protein degradation in mitochondria. The mitochondrial processing peptidase: function and specificity. Allosteric proteins after thirty years: the binding and state functions of the neuronal alpha 7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1