Quantification of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in the liquid medium by fluorimetry and its use in phagocytosis assay.

W Fang
{"title":"Quantification of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in the liquid medium by fluorimetry and its use in phagocytosis assay.","authors":"W Fang","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03260.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A fluorimetric technique was compared with the plate counting method for quantification of viable cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in the liquid medium. The fluorimetric assay measures the release of fluorogenic 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) from 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate by the bacterial phosphatases. The increase in fluorescence was dependent on the size of bacterial inocula. Setting the fluorescence threshold at the middle of the logarithmic growth phase resulted in good linear relationship between bacterial counts and fluorescence (r = 0.99 for both Staph. aureus and E. coli). There was also an excellent correlation between the fluorimetric assay and the plate counting method in quantifying viable bacteria in saline (r = 0.99). Both methods were further compared for evaluation of extracellular bacteria following phagocytosis. The fluorimetric technique, in general, gave a higher percentage of phagocytosis than the plate counting method with statistical significance for E. coli.</p>","PeriodicalId":22599,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied bacteriology","volume":"80 6","pages":"577-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03260.x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03260.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A fluorimetric technique was compared with the plate counting method for quantification of viable cells of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in the liquid medium. The fluorimetric assay measures the release of fluorogenic 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) from 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate by the bacterial phosphatases. The increase in fluorescence was dependent on the size of bacterial inocula. Setting the fluorescence threshold at the middle of the logarithmic growth phase resulted in good linear relationship between bacterial counts and fluorescence (r = 0.99 for both Staph. aureus and E. coli). There was also an excellent correlation between the fluorimetric assay and the plate counting method in quantifying viable bacteria in saline (r = 0.99). Both methods were further compared for evaluation of extracellular bacteria following phagocytosis. The fluorimetric technique, in general, gave a higher percentage of phagocytosis than the plate counting method with statistical significance for E. coli.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体培养基中金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的荧光定量及其在吞噬试验中的应用。
用荧光法和平板计数法对液体培养基中金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的活菌量进行了比较。荧光法测定了细菌磷酸酶从4-甲基伞形草酰磷酸中释放的荧光性4-甲基伞形草酮(4-MU)。荧光的增加与接种菌的大小有关。将荧光阈值设置在对数生长期的中间,两种葡萄球菌的荧光与细菌数量呈良好的线性关系(r = 0.99)。金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌)。荧光法和平板计数法在定量生理盐水中活菌方面也有很好的相关性(r = 0.99)。进一步比较两种方法对吞噬后细胞外细菌的评价。一般来说,荧光技术对大肠杆菌的吞噬率比平板计数法高,具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Yersinia enterocolitica. Isolation, partial characterization and mode of action of acidocin J1229, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus JCM 1229. Note: isolation, characterization and epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica from humans and animals. Application of antimicrobial-producing lactic acid bacteria to control pathogens in ready-to-use vegetables. The effect of chlorhexidine on defined, mixed culture oral biofilms grown in a novel model system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1