Co-induction of anaesthesia: the rationale.

R Amrein, W Hetzel, S R Allen
{"title":"Co-induction of anaesthesia: the rationale.","authors":"R Amrein,&nbsp;W Hetzel,&nbsp;S R Allen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combination therapy with two or more different drugs, with the intention of reaching the same therapeutic goal, was heavily criticized for a long time. However, it is accepted today, especially when advantages over monotherapy can be shown. For the induction of anaesthesia or for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit, combination therapy may offer an improved effect profile, a more balanced ratio of desired versus adverse effects, an improved time-course of effect, simpler treatment requirements or lower costs. Midazolam and propofol have been investigated as potential partners for those two indications. The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, pharmacological effect, the way in which they interact at the receptor site, the differences in pharmaceutical formulations, the side-effect profiles and economic considerations were compared. Animal experiments and clinical pharmacology studies have shown that midazolam and propofol have synergy with other centrally active drugs. It could be expected that the relationship between desired effects and adverse effects could be improved by skilful use of the synergism between midazolam and propofol. Co-induction of anaesthesia and co-administration in long-term sedation can offer improvements in therapeutic situations compared with monotherapy. These improvements are in terms of a more suitable effect profile, a more favourable ratio of desirable effects to side-effects, optimization of the time-course of effects and reduced costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11873,"journal":{"name":"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of anaesthesiology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combination therapy with two or more different drugs, with the intention of reaching the same therapeutic goal, was heavily criticized for a long time. However, it is accepted today, especially when advantages over monotherapy can be shown. For the induction of anaesthesia or for long-term sedation in the intensive care unit, combination therapy may offer an improved effect profile, a more balanced ratio of desired versus adverse effects, an improved time-course of effect, simpler treatment requirements or lower costs. Midazolam and propofol have been investigated as potential partners for those two indications. The mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic properties, pharmacological effect, the way in which they interact at the receptor site, the differences in pharmaceutical formulations, the side-effect profiles and economic considerations were compared. Animal experiments and clinical pharmacology studies have shown that midazolam and propofol have synergy with other centrally active drugs. It could be expected that the relationship between desired effects and adverse effects could be improved by skilful use of the synergism between midazolam and propofol. Co-induction of anaesthesia and co-administration in long-term sedation can offer improvements in therapeutic situations compared with monotherapy. These improvements are in terms of a more suitable effect profile, a more favourable ratio of desirable effects to side-effects, optimization of the time-course of effects and reduced costs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉共诱导:原理。
长期以来,以达到相同治疗目标为目的的两种或两种以上不同药物的联合治疗受到了严厉的批评。然而,它今天被接受,特别是当优于单一疗法可以显示。对于麻醉诱导或重症监护病房的长期镇静,联合治疗可以提供更好的效果,更平衡的预期与不良反应的比例,更长的效果时间,更简单的治疗要求或更低的成本。咪达唑仑和异丙酚已被研究作为这两种适应症的潜在合作伙伴。比较了它们的作用机制、药代动力学性质、药理作用、受体相互作用的方式、药物配方的差异、副作用概况和经济考虑。动物实验和临床药理学研究表明咪达唑仑和异丙酚与其他中枢活性药物有协同作用。可以预期,咪达唑仑和异丙酚之间的协同作用的巧妙利用可以改善预期效果和不良反应之间的关系。与单一治疗相比,长期镇静的共诱导麻醉和共给药可以改善治疗情况。这些改进是在更合适的效果轮廓,更有利的预期效果与副作用的比例,效果的时间过程的优化和降低成本方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in a piglet model: readings are influenced by the colour of the cover Clinical sedation and bispectral index in burn children receiving gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Acute Normovolemic hemodilution during CABG induces diastolic dysfunction: A perioperative transesophageal echocardiographic study EuroNeuro 2010. Abstracts of the 6th EuroNeuro Congress. Porto, Portugal. February 4-6, 2010. 5th EuroNeuro 2008. Maastricht, The Netherlands. January 16-19, 2008. Abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1