An expert system based on causal knowledge: validation on post-cardiosurgical patients

E. Artioli, G. Avanzolini, L. Martelli, M. Ursino
{"title":"An expert system based on causal knowledge: validation on post-cardiosurgical patients","authors":"E. Artioli,&nbsp;G. Avanzolini,&nbsp;L. Martelli,&nbsp;M. Ursino","doi":"10.1016/0020-7101(95)01153-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A new expert system for the analysis of post-cardiosurgical patients in Intensive Care Units is described, and a preliminary validation performed. The inference engine employs a hybrid reasoning method which integrates quantitative and qualitative simulation techniques in an original manner. The long-term knowledge consists of a causal network which reproduces the main relationships between physiological quantities involved in the course after cardiac surgery. Emphasis has been given to respiratory and metabolic, as well as cardiovascular quantities both in the systemic and pulmonary circulations. Preliminary system validation has been performed on a set of 40 cardiosurgical patients, previously classified either at normal-risk (17 patients) or at high-risk (23 patients) by means of statistical classification techniques. In most cases, predictions of the expert system substantially agree with those provided by the more traditional statistical method. The system, however, is also able to furnish detailed explanations on the possible physiological causes responsible for the patient status. In particular, simulation results indicate that a reduction in the cardiac index (19 cases) and an increase in the oxygen utilization coefficient (19 cases) are the most critical alterations in the high-risk patients. The system imputes the reduced cardiac index to a rise in total systemic resistance (15 high-risk patients), a decrease in cardiac strength (2 high-risk patients) or an insufficient filling volume of the systemic circulation (4 high-risk patients). Furthermore, in 6 high-risk patients the depressed cardiac outflow occurs with a reduction in the arterial oxygen content, mainly imputable to an insufficiency of blood hemoglobin content. Finally, two examples of the complete expert system explanatory capabilities are shown with reference to a pair of high-risk patients and discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75935,"journal":{"name":"International journal of bio-medical computing","volume":"41 1","pages":"Pages 19-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0020-7101(95)01153-6","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of bio-medical computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0020710195011536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A new expert system for the analysis of post-cardiosurgical patients in Intensive Care Units is described, and a preliminary validation performed. The inference engine employs a hybrid reasoning method which integrates quantitative and qualitative simulation techniques in an original manner. The long-term knowledge consists of a causal network which reproduces the main relationships between physiological quantities involved in the course after cardiac surgery. Emphasis has been given to respiratory and metabolic, as well as cardiovascular quantities both in the systemic and pulmonary circulations. Preliminary system validation has been performed on a set of 40 cardiosurgical patients, previously classified either at normal-risk (17 patients) or at high-risk (23 patients) by means of statistical classification techniques. In most cases, predictions of the expert system substantially agree with those provided by the more traditional statistical method. The system, however, is also able to furnish detailed explanations on the possible physiological causes responsible for the patient status. In particular, simulation results indicate that a reduction in the cardiac index (19 cases) and an increase in the oxygen utilization coefficient (19 cases) are the most critical alterations in the high-risk patients. The system imputes the reduced cardiac index to a rise in total systemic resistance (15 high-risk patients), a decrease in cardiac strength (2 high-risk patients) or an insufficient filling volume of the systemic circulation (4 high-risk patients). Furthermore, in 6 high-risk patients the depressed cardiac outflow occurs with a reduction in the arterial oxygen content, mainly imputable to an insufficiency of blood hemoglobin content. Finally, two examples of the complete expert system explanatory capabilities are shown with reference to a pair of high-risk patients and discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于因果知识的专家系统:对心脏手术后患者的验证
本文描述了一种新的专家系统,用于分析重症监护病房的心脏手术后患者,并进行了初步验证。该推理引擎采用了一种混合推理方法,以新颖的方式将定量和定性模拟技术结合在一起。长期知识由一个因果网络组成,该网络再现了心脏手术后过程中涉及的生理量之间的主要关系。重点是呼吸和代谢,以及在体循环和肺循环中的心血管量。初步系统验证已在一组40例心脏外科患者中进行,这些患者先前通过统计分类技术分为正常风险(17例)和高风险(23例)。在大多数情况下,专家系统的预测基本上与更传统的统计方法提供的预测一致。然而,该系统也能够对可能导致患者状态的生理原因提供详细的解释。特别是,模拟结果表明,心脏指数的降低(19例)和氧气利用系数的增加(19例)是高危患者最关键的变化。该系统将心脏指数降低归因于全身总阻力升高(15例高危患者)、心脏强度下降(2例高危患者)或体循环充盈量不足(4例高危患者)。此外,在6例高危患者中,心流出量下降与动脉氧含量降低同时发生,主要归因于血液血红蛋白含量不足。最后,以一对高危患者为例,给出了完整的专家系统解释能力的两个例子,并进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Method for Diagnosing in Large Medical Expert Systems Based on Causal Probabilistic Networks Subject index Volume contents Editorial Author index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1