A retrospective study of the use of cisplatinum-5-fluorouracil neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)

P.M.L. Teo , T.W.T. Leung , A.T.C. Chan , P. Yu , W.Y. Lee , S.F. Leung , W.H. Kwan , P. Johnson
{"title":"A retrospective study of the use of cisplatinum-5-fluorouracil neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)","authors":"P.M.L. Teo ,&nbsp;T.W.T. Leung ,&nbsp;A.T.C. Chan ,&nbsp;P. Yu ,&nbsp;W.Y. Lee ,&nbsp;S.F. Leung ,&nbsp;W.H. Kwan ,&nbsp;P. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/0964-1955(95)00026-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A retrospective study on 422 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with cervical nodal metastases treated between 1984 and 1987 was performed. 169 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHEMO) with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil for two or three courses prior to definitive radiotherapy and 253 were treated by radical radiotherapy alone (NCHEMO). While the primary tumour (T-stage) prognosticators had been comparable between the two groups, CHEMO had significantly more advanced cervical nodal metastases with bulkier nodes and more low-cervical and supraclavicular nodes (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) which could account for its overall worse survival, poorer regional tumour control and a trend towards worse systemic tumour control. The worse regional control in CHEMO for Ho's N1 could be the result of more bulky nodes and more tumours infiltrating the skull base and/or causing cranial nerve(s) palsy. There was no statistical or apparent difference between CHEMO and NCHEMO for the same Ho's overall stages of NPC with comparable nodal and primary tumour characteristics for the clinical endpoints of actuarial survival rate (ASR), disease-free survival rate (DFS), free of local failure survival rate (FLF), and free from distant metastases survival rate (FDM), despite the presence of significantly more fixed nodes and bulky nodes. This suggests a possible beneficial effect of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, multivariate analysis has not shown the administration of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be of prognostic significance. Even though the chemotherapy was well tolerated with little toxicity, we recommend against the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive NPC outside the context of a prospective randomised clinical trial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77118,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cancer. Part B, Oral oncology","volume":"31 6","pages":"Pages 373-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0964-1955(95)00026-7","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cancer. Part B, Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0964195595000267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

A retrospective study on 422 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with cervical nodal metastases treated between 1984 and 1987 was performed. 169 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHEMO) with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil for two or three courses prior to definitive radiotherapy and 253 were treated by radical radiotherapy alone (NCHEMO). While the primary tumour (T-stage) prognosticators had been comparable between the two groups, CHEMO had significantly more advanced cervical nodal metastases with bulkier nodes and more low-cervical and supraclavicular nodes (P < 0.05) which could account for its overall worse survival, poorer regional tumour control and a trend towards worse systemic tumour control. The worse regional control in CHEMO for Ho's N1 could be the result of more bulky nodes and more tumours infiltrating the skull base and/or causing cranial nerve(s) palsy. There was no statistical or apparent difference between CHEMO and NCHEMO for the same Ho's overall stages of NPC with comparable nodal and primary tumour characteristics for the clinical endpoints of actuarial survival rate (ASR), disease-free survival rate (DFS), free of local failure survival rate (FLF), and free from distant metastases survival rate (FDM), despite the presence of significantly more fixed nodes and bulky nodes. This suggests a possible beneficial effect of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, multivariate analysis has not shown the administration of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be of prognostic significance. Even though the chemotherapy was well tolerated with little toxicity, we recommend against the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive NPC outside the context of a prospective randomised clinical trial.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
顺铂-5-氟尿嘧啶新辅助化疗在宫颈结阳性鼻咽癌中的应用回顾性研究
对1984 ~ 1987年间422例鼻咽癌颈淋巴结转移患者进行回顾性分析。169例患者在最终放疗前接受顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶新辅助化疗(CHEMO) 2或3个疗程,253例患者单独接受根治性放疗(NCHEMO)。虽然原发肿瘤(t期)预后指标在两组之间是相当的,但化疗组有明显更晚期的宫颈淋巴结转移,淋巴结体积更大,颈下和锁骨上淋巴结更多(P <0.05),这可以解释其总体生存率较差,局部肿瘤控制较差以及系统性肿瘤控制较差的趋势。Ho's N1化疗中较差的区域控制可能是由于更大的淋巴结和更多的肿瘤浸润颅底和/或引起脑神经麻痹的结果。尽管存在明显更多的固定淋巴结和大体积淋巴结,但在相同的Ho's NPC总分期中,化疗和非化疗在精算生存率(ASR)、无病生存率(DFS)、无局部衰竭生存率(FLF)和无远处转移生存率(FDM)等临床终点上具有相似的淋巴结和原发性肿瘤特征,没有统计学差异或明显差异。这表明新辅助化疗可能有有益的效果。然而,多变量分析并未显示新辅助化疗的实施对预后有重要意义。尽管化疗耐受性良好且毒性小,但我们建议在前瞻性随机临床试验之外,不建议在宫颈淋巴结阳性的NPC中常规使用新辅助化疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mutagen sensitivity: Enhanced risk assessment of squamous cell carcinoma Efficacy of vitamin A in the prevention of loco-regional recurrence and second primaries in head and neck cancer Serum levels of CYFRA 21-1 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its possible role in monitoring of therapy Quantitative scale of oral mucositis associated with autologous bone marrow transplantation Discordance of p53 status in matched primary tumours and metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1