Neuroimmunomodulation: classical and non-classical cellular activation

Albert Agro , Andrzej M. Stanisz
{"title":"Neuroimmunomodulation: classical and non-classical cellular activation","authors":"Albert Agro ,&nbsp;Andrzej M. Stanisz","doi":"10.1016/0960-5428(95)00018-W","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As neuroimmunologists, we are often faced with the fact that some substances can either enhance or inhibit particular immune/inflammatory cell functions. This ‘duality’ could only partially be explained by a dose-dependency and the fact that in a variety of systems, heterogenous cell populations are commonly used. For example it has been repetitively shown that cell proliferation, immunoglobulin synthesis and NK (natural killer) activity could be enhanced, inhibited or not affected at all by such neuropeptides as somatostatin (SOM) or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), depending on the experimental conditions. Even substance P (SP), which, in general, stimulates lymphocyte activity, can, under certain conditions, possess an inhibitory activity. These apparent discrepancies between various groups and experimental conditions met with a strong reservation among ‘classical’ immunologists as they questioned the true physiological role that neuro-immune interactions play in normal and disease states. However, upon a detailed analysis of the data, it become obvious why such discrepancies abounded. Not only are we comparing totally different responses in different species, but almost always we compare different experimental conditions. In lieu of this, the reproducibility of the experiments within the same laboratory is in fact very high.</p><p>One fundamental and striking observation is the fact that at the level of a homogeneous cell population, a differential response could be evoked by the same neuropeptide over a range of concentrations.</p><p>For the purpose of this brief report we will focus on the cellular responses to the neuropeptide substance P and we will try to illustrate why such differential responses are possible. Some of the physiological data relating to the effects of SP on cell function will be discussed. This will be followed by a synopsis of SP receptor mechanisms on effector cells and finally the mechanism by which SP activates secondary messenger systems in these cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79314,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neuroimmunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0960-5428(95)00018-W","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neuroimmunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/096054289500018W","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

As neuroimmunologists, we are often faced with the fact that some substances can either enhance or inhibit particular immune/inflammatory cell functions. This ‘duality’ could only partially be explained by a dose-dependency and the fact that in a variety of systems, heterogenous cell populations are commonly used. For example it has been repetitively shown that cell proliferation, immunoglobulin synthesis and NK (natural killer) activity could be enhanced, inhibited or not affected at all by such neuropeptides as somatostatin (SOM) or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), depending on the experimental conditions. Even substance P (SP), which, in general, stimulates lymphocyte activity, can, under certain conditions, possess an inhibitory activity. These apparent discrepancies between various groups and experimental conditions met with a strong reservation among ‘classical’ immunologists as they questioned the true physiological role that neuro-immune interactions play in normal and disease states. However, upon a detailed analysis of the data, it become obvious why such discrepancies abounded. Not only are we comparing totally different responses in different species, but almost always we compare different experimental conditions. In lieu of this, the reproducibility of the experiments within the same laboratory is in fact very high.

One fundamental and striking observation is the fact that at the level of a homogeneous cell population, a differential response could be evoked by the same neuropeptide over a range of concentrations.

For the purpose of this brief report we will focus on the cellular responses to the neuropeptide substance P and we will try to illustrate why such differential responses are possible. Some of the physiological data relating to the effects of SP on cell function will be discussed. This will be followed by a synopsis of SP receptor mechanisms on effector cells and finally the mechanism by which SP activates secondary messenger systems in these cells.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经免疫调节:经典和非经典细胞激活
作为神经免疫学家,我们经常面临这样一个事实,即某些物质可以增强或抑制特定的免疫/炎症细胞功能。这种“二元性”只能部分地用剂量依赖性和在各种系统中通常使用异质细胞群的事实来解释。例如,多次研究表明,根据实验条件,生长抑素(SOM)或血管活性肠肽(VIP)等神经肽可增强、抑制或完全不影响细胞增殖、免疫球蛋白合成和NK(自然杀手)活性。即使是通常刺激淋巴细胞活性的P物质(SP),在一定条件下也具有抑制活性。不同群体和实验条件之间的这些明显差异在“经典”免疫学家中受到强烈保留,因为他们质疑神经免疫相互作用在正常和疾病状态下所起的真正生理作用。然而,经过对数据的详细分析,这种差异大量存在的原因就显而易见了。我们不仅比较不同物种的完全不同的反应,而且几乎总是比较不同的实验条件。相反,在同一个实验室中,实验的可重复性实际上非常高。一个基本的和引人注目的观察是,在同质细胞群的水平上,同一种神经肽在不同浓度范围内可能引起不同的反应。为了这个简短报告的目的,我们将集中在细胞对神经肽物质P的反应,我们将试图说明为什么这种差异反应是可能的。一些与SP对细胞功能影响有关的生理数据将被讨论。接下来将简要介绍SP受体在效应细胞中的作用机制,最后介绍SP激活这些细胞中的次级信使系统的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction Preface The significance of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in immunomodulation Expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide in lymphocytes: a possible endogenous role in the regulation of the immune system Functional and molecular characterization of VIP receptors and signal transduction in human and rodent immune systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1