Myocardial reperfusion after coronary bypass surgery. Suture of only distal or all anastomoses with the aorta cross-clamped?

A Rajalin, K Kuttila, J Niinikoski, T Savunen, E Vänttinen, H Heikkilä, J Jalonen, J Perttilä, M Valtonen, E Engblom
{"title":"Myocardial reperfusion after coronary bypass surgery. Suture of only distal or all anastomoses with the aorta cross-clamped?","authors":"A Rajalin,&nbsp;K Kuttila,&nbsp;J Niinikoski,&nbsp;T Savunen,&nbsp;E Vänttinen,&nbsp;H Heikkilä,&nbsp;J Jalonen,&nbsp;J Perttilä,&nbsp;M Valtonen,&nbsp;E Engblom","doi":"10.3109/14017439509107226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated into two groups, each of 30 patients and similar as regards age, sex, number of coronary artery bypasses and left ventricular ejection fraction. In group A the proximal anastomoses of vein grafts were sutured after aortic declamping during partial occlusion of the aorta, and in group B these anastomoses were done during aortic cross-clamping. The aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group B than in group A (72 vs 57 min, p < 0.0001). Myocardial cooling and rewarming and the number of sustained or possible perioperative myocardial infarctions were equal in both groups. Central haemodynamics showed no intergroup difference, before or after induction of anaesthesia or at the end of surgery. Conduction disturbances were more common in group A than in group B (12 vs 3, p = 0.0246), and transient external pacing was more often required in group A (9 vs 2, p = 0.0534). Myocardial reperfusion via native coronary arteries and bypass grafts gives better protection against conduction disturbances than does reperfusion via only native arteries, despite longer aortic cross-clamping time.","PeriodicalId":76527,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"175-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14017439509107226","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14017439509107226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Sixty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated into two groups, each of 30 patients and similar as regards age, sex, number of coronary artery bypasses and left ventricular ejection fraction. In group A the proximal anastomoses of vein grafts were sutured after aortic declamping during partial occlusion of the aorta, and in group B these anastomoses were done during aortic cross-clamping. The aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group B than in group A (72 vs 57 min, p < 0.0001). Myocardial cooling and rewarming and the number of sustained or possible perioperative myocardial infarctions were equal in both groups. Central haemodynamics showed no intergroup difference, before or after induction of anaesthesia or at the end of surgery. Conduction disturbances were more common in group A than in group B (12 vs 3, p = 0.0246), and transient external pacing was more often required in group A (9 vs 2, p = 0.0534). Myocardial reperfusion via native coronary arteries and bypass grafts gives better protection against conduction disturbances than does reperfusion via only native arteries, despite longer aortic cross-clamping time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉搭桥术后心肌再灌注。仅远端吻合口缝合还是全部吻合口交叉夹住主动脉?
60例择期行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者随机分为两组,每组30例,年龄、性别、冠状动脉旁路次数、左心室射血分数相近。A组在主动脉部分闭塞时进行主动脉剥离后缝合移植物近端吻合口,B组在主动脉交叉夹闭时缝合移植物近端吻合口。B组主动脉交叉夹持时间明显长于A组(72 min vs 57 min, p < 0.0001)。两组心肌冷却和复温以及持续或可能的围手术期心肌梗死数量相等。中枢血流动力学在麻醉前、麻醉后或手术结束时均无组间差异。A组比B组更常见传导障碍(12 vs 3, p = 0.0246), A组更需要瞬态体外起搏(9 vs 2, p = 0.0534)。尽管主动脉交叉夹持时间较长,但通过天然冠状动脉和旁路移植术进行心肌再灌注比仅通过天然动脉进行再灌注能更好地保护心肌免受传导障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationships between divisions of the lingular bronchus and vascularization patterns in the lingula. A new no-touch preparation technique. Technical notes. Delayed intrathoracic herniation of the stomach with pleural empyema due to diaphragmatic stab wound. Pleuroscopy: therapeutic applications. In vivo assessment of luminal cross-sectional areas and circumferential tension-strain relations of the porcine aorta.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1