A Rajalin, K Kuttila, J Niinikoski, T Savunen, E Vänttinen, H Heikkilä, J Jalonen, J Perttilä, M Valtonen, E Engblom
{"title":"Myocardial reperfusion after coronary bypass surgery. Suture of only distal or all anastomoses with the aorta cross-clamped?","authors":"A Rajalin, K Kuttila, J Niinikoski, T Savunen, E Vänttinen, H Heikkilä, J Jalonen, J Perttilä, M Valtonen, E Engblom","doi":"10.3109/14017439509107226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated into two groups, each of 30 patients and similar as regards age, sex, number of coronary artery bypasses and left ventricular ejection fraction. In group A the proximal anastomoses of vein grafts were sutured after aortic declamping during partial occlusion of the aorta, and in group B these anastomoses were done during aortic cross-clamping. The aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group B than in group A (72 vs 57 min, p < 0.0001). Myocardial cooling and rewarming and the number of sustained or possible perioperative myocardial infarctions were equal in both groups. Central haemodynamics showed no intergroup difference, before or after induction of anaesthesia or at the end of surgery. Conduction disturbances were more common in group A than in group B (12 vs 3, p = 0.0246), and transient external pacing was more often required in group A (9 vs 2, p = 0.0534). Myocardial reperfusion via native coronary arteries and bypass grafts gives better protection against conduction disturbances than does reperfusion via only native arteries, despite longer aortic cross-clamping time.","PeriodicalId":76527,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery","volume":"29 4","pages":"175-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14017439509107226","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14017439509107226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Sixty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated into two groups, each of 30 patients and similar as regards age, sex, number of coronary artery bypasses and left ventricular ejection fraction. In group A the proximal anastomoses of vein grafts were sutured after aortic declamping during partial occlusion of the aorta, and in group B these anastomoses were done during aortic cross-clamping. The aortic cross-clamp time was significantly longer in group B than in group A (72 vs 57 min, p < 0.0001). Myocardial cooling and rewarming and the number of sustained or possible perioperative myocardial infarctions were equal in both groups. Central haemodynamics showed no intergroup difference, before or after induction of anaesthesia or at the end of surgery. Conduction disturbances were more common in group A than in group B (12 vs 3, p = 0.0246), and transient external pacing was more often required in group A (9 vs 2, p = 0.0534). Myocardial reperfusion via native coronary arteries and bypass grafts gives better protection against conduction disturbances than does reperfusion via only native arteries, despite longer aortic cross-clamping time.
60例择期行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者随机分为两组,每组30例,年龄、性别、冠状动脉旁路次数、左心室射血分数相近。A组在主动脉部分闭塞时进行主动脉剥离后缝合移植物近端吻合口,B组在主动脉交叉夹闭时缝合移植物近端吻合口。B组主动脉交叉夹持时间明显长于A组(72 min vs 57 min, p < 0.0001)。两组心肌冷却和复温以及持续或可能的围手术期心肌梗死数量相等。中枢血流动力学在麻醉前、麻醉后或手术结束时均无组间差异。A组比B组更常见传导障碍(12 vs 3, p = 0.0246), A组更需要瞬态体外起搏(9 vs 2, p = 0.0534)。尽管主动脉交叉夹持时间较长,但通过天然冠状动脉和旁路移植术进行心肌再灌注比仅通过天然动脉进行再灌注能更好地保护心肌免受传导障碍。