{"title":"Appendicitis: trends and risks, 1996.","authors":"H M Delany","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current changes in the clinical diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis relate to managed care policies and procedures, newer diagnostic techniques, laparoscopy, scoring analysis of clinical data, and nonoperative treatment. Analysis of results of studies using ultrasonography, computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and diagnostic scoring continues with the intent of developing improved sensitivity and specificity in predicting the presence of acute appendicitis, but it is still not possible to achieve an accurate, uniform, definitive preoperative diagnosis of the disease. The addition of current diagnostic procedures has probably shortened the period of observation for doubtful cases of acute appendiceal inflammation and has established the presence of the disease by means other than clinical examination, interpretation of symptoms, and laboratory tests. Diagnostic scoring systems have been described with enthusiasm, but they are not generally popular and require considerable effort to be clinically useful. The use of laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy is exciting and very in tune with the modern trend in abdominal surgery. However, increasing concern has been expressed that diagnostic advances will be paralleled by delays in patient treatment. Since some delays have been described for management and treatment of acute appendicitis, any delays related to new trends in health care system organization should be monitored carefully.</p>","PeriodicalId":77227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians : the official publication of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians : the official publication of the Association for Academic Minority Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current changes in the clinical diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis relate to managed care policies and procedures, newer diagnostic techniques, laparoscopy, scoring analysis of clinical data, and nonoperative treatment. Analysis of results of studies using ultrasonography, computed tomography, radionuclide scanning, and diagnostic scoring continues with the intent of developing improved sensitivity and specificity in predicting the presence of acute appendicitis, but it is still not possible to achieve an accurate, uniform, definitive preoperative diagnosis of the disease. The addition of current diagnostic procedures has probably shortened the period of observation for doubtful cases of acute appendiceal inflammation and has established the presence of the disease by means other than clinical examination, interpretation of symptoms, and laboratory tests. Diagnostic scoring systems have been described with enthusiasm, but they are not generally popular and require considerable effort to be clinically useful. The use of laparoscopy and laparoscopic appendectomy is exciting and very in tune with the modern trend in abdominal surgery. However, increasing concern has been expressed that diagnostic advances will be paralleled by delays in patient treatment. Since some delays have been described for management and treatment of acute appendicitis, any delays related to new trends in health care system organization should be monitored carefully.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾炎:趋势和风险,1996。
目前急性阑尾炎的临床诊断和治疗的变化涉及管理护理政策和程序、更新的诊断技术、腹腔镜检查、临床数据评分分析和非手术治疗。使用超声、计算机断层扫描、放射性核素扫描和诊断评分的研究结果分析继续进行,目的是提高预测急性阑尾炎存在的敏感性和特异性,但仍不可能实现对该疾病的准确、统一、明确的术前诊断。当前诊断程序的增加可能缩短了急性阑尾炎症可疑病例的观察时间,并通过临床检查、症状解释和实验室检查以外的手段确定了疾病的存在。诊断评分系统已经被热情地描述,但它们并不普遍流行,需要相当大的努力才能在临床上有用。腹腔镜和腹腔镜阑尾切除术的使用是令人兴奋的,并且非常符合现代腹部手术的趋势。然而,越来越多的人担心,诊断的进步将与患者治疗的延误并行。由于急性阑尾炎的管理和治疗出现了一些延误,任何与卫生保健系统组织的新趋势有关的延误都应仔细监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Return on investment analysis for a computer-based patient record in the outpatient clinic setting. Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in African Americans. Early detection and screening for ovarian cancer: does physician specialty matter? Adiposity changes in youth with a family history of cardiovascular disease: impact of ethnicity, gender and socioeconomic status. Health disparities research--a model for conducting research on cancer disparities: characterization and reduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1