Challenge interval determines tachyphylaxis to aerosolized LTD4

Flemming Madsen , Lars Frølund , Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
{"title":"Challenge interval determines tachyphylaxis to aerosolized LTD4","authors":"Flemming Madsen ,&nbsp;Lars Frølund ,&nbsp;Charlotte Suppli Ulrik","doi":"10.1006/pulp.1995.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Leukotrienes (LK) play an important role in the inflammatory response found in the asthmatic airway and it is therefore of interest to explore the clinical value of agents which can either block the effect or inhibit the synthesis of leukotrienes. If tachyphylaxis does not develop, repeated LTD<sub>4</sub> challenges can be used for dose ranging studies.</p><p>Tachyphylaxis has been observed when LTD<sub>4</sub> challenge intervals are kept below 1 h, but the effect of prolonging the interval is uncertain. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the interval between LTD<sub>4</sub> challenges necessary to avoid development of tachyphylaxis.</p><p>Ten stable adult asthmatics with moderate asthma were challenged seven times: a screening day to secure responsiveness to LTD<sub>4</sub>, two challenges on three separate days with an interval of 2, 4 and 6h, respectively. No significant differences between mean PC<sub>20</sub>-LTD<sub>4</sub> Values (<em>P</em>&gt;0.5) was found. It was concluded that tachyphylaxis to repeated LTD<sub>4</sub> challenges of asthmatics does not develop when challenge intervals are prolonged above 2 h.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74618,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology","volume":"8 6","pages":"Pages 245-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/pulp.1995.1033","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952060085710332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Leukotrienes (LK) play an important role in the inflammatory response found in the asthmatic airway and it is therefore of interest to explore the clinical value of agents which can either block the effect or inhibit the synthesis of leukotrienes. If tachyphylaxis does not develop, repeated LTD4 challenges can be used for dose ranging studies.

Tachyphylaxis has been observed when LTD4 challenge intervals are kept below 1 h, but the effect of prolonging the interval is uncertain. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the interval between LTD4 challenges necessary to avoid development of tachyphylaxis.

Ten stable adult asthmatics with moderate asthma were challenged seven times: a screening day to secure responsiveness to LTD4, two challenges on three separate days with an interval of 2, 4 and 6h, respectively. No significant differences between mean PC20-LTD4 Values (P>0.5) was found. It was concluded that tachyphylaxis to repeated LTD4 challenges of asthmatics does not develop when challenge intervals are prolonged above 2 h.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挑战间隔决定了对雾化LTD4的快速反应
白三烯(Leukotrienes, LK)在哮喘气道的炎症反应中起着重要作用,因此探索能够阻断白三烯作用或抑制白三烯合成的药物的临床价值是值得关注的。如果快速反应没有发生,重复LTD4挑战可用于剂量范围研究。当LTD4激发间隔低于1 h时,观察到快速反应,但延长间隔的效果不确定。因此,本研究的目的是调查LTD4挑战之间的间隔,以避免快速反应的发展。10名患有中度哮喘的稳定成人哮喘患者接受了7次挑战:1天筛查以确保对LTD4的反应性,3天两次挑战,间隔时间分别为2、4和6小时。PC20-LTD4平均值之间无显著差异(P>0.5)。由此可见,哮喘患者对LTD4重复激射的快速反应在激射间隔延长2 h以上时不会发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of the Larynx in Cough Central Nervous Mechanisms in Cough Sensory Mechanisms Inhalation Cough Challenge in the Investigation of the Cough Reflex and Antitussives Cough and Other Reflexes on Irritation of Airway Mucosa in Man
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1