A comparison of the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, salbutamol and Ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

M.G. Matera , M. Cazzola , A. Vinciguerra , F. Di Perna , F. Calderaro , M. Caputi , F. Rossi
{"title":"A comparison of the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, salbutamol and Ipratropium bromide in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease","authors":"M.G. Matera ,&nbsp;M. Cazzola ,&nbsp;A. Vinciguerra ,&nbsp;F. Di Perna ,&nbsp;F. Calderaro ,&nbsp;M. Caputi ,&nbsp;F. Rossi","doi":"10.1006/pulp.1995.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bronchodilator efficacy of salbutamol (200 μg), salmeterol (50 μg) and ipratropium bromide (40 μg) aerosols las been compared in 16 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using a double-blind placebo controlled cross-over design. When absolute changes in FEV, were used as the response criterion, efficacy of the three drugs was significantly better than placebo (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05). The onset of bronchodilatation after ipratropium bromide was slower than after salbutamol, but ipratropium induced more and longer-lasting bronchodilatation than the adrenergic drug. Salmeterol was slower but its duration was longer than salbutamol. The onset of the effect of salmeterol was slower than ipratropium bromide, but salmeterol showed, on average, superior bronchodilator efficacy compared with the anticholinergic agent, sustaining bronchodilation longer than ipratropium bromide (responses to salmeterol were significantly (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) greater than those to ipratropium bromide from 4–12 h time period, but from 15 min to 1 h time periods response to ipratropium bromide exceeded salmeterol). The mean FEV, area under the curve was significantly (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) larger after salmeterol when compared to ipratropium bromide and salbutamol. Moreover, the mean FEV, area under the curve after ipratropium bromide was significantly (<em>P</em>&lt;0.05) higher than that after salbutamol. In any case, our data showed individual differences in patient response. We conclude that salmeterol compares favourably with ipratropium bromide in terms of effects on lung function at clinically recommended doses because it has a longer duration of action than ipratropium bromide. The longer dosing intervals, which may enhance compliance, encourage its administration in patients with COPD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74618,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary pharmacology","volume":"8 6","pages":"Pages 267-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/pulp.1995.1036","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952060085710368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Bronchodilator efficacy of salbutamol (200 μg), salmeterol (50 μg) and ipratropium bromide (40 μg) aerosols las been compared in 16 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using a double-blind placebo controlled cross-over design. When absolute changes in FEV, were used as the response criterion, efficacy of the three drugs was significantly better than placebo (P<0.05). The onset of bronchodilatation after ipratropium bromide was slower than after salbutamol, but ipratropium induced more and longer-lasting bronchodilatation than the adrenergic drug. Salmeterol was slower but its duration was longer than salbutamol. The onset of the effect of salmeterol was slower than ipratropium bromide, but salmeterol showed, on average, superior bronchodilator efficacy compared with the anticholinergic agent, sustaining bronchodilation longer than ipratropium bromide (responses to salmeterol were significantly (P<0.05) greater than those to ipratropium bromide from 4–12 h time period, but from 15 min to 1 h time periods response to ipratropium bromide exceeded salmeterol). The mean FEV, area under the curve was significantly (P<0.05) larger after salmeterol when compared to ipratropium bromide and salbutamol. Moreover, the mean FEV, area under the curve after ipratropium bromide was significantly (P<0.05) higher than that after salbutamol. In any case, our data showed individual differences in patient response. We conclude that salmeterol compares favourably with ipratropium bromide in terms of effects on lung function at clinically recommended doses because it has a longer duration of action than ipratropium bromide. The longer dosing intervals, which may enhance compliance, encourage its administration in patients with COPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙美特罗、沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者支气管扩张作用的比较
采用双盲安慰剂对照交叉设计,比较了沙丁胺醇(200 μg)、沙美特罗(50 μg)和异丙托溴铵(40 μg)气雾剂对16例稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支气管扩张疗效。以FEV的绝对变化作为疗效标准时,三种药物的疗效均显著优于安慰剂(P<0.05)。异丙托品溴化后支气管扩张的开始时间比沙丁胺醇后慢,但异丙托品诱导的支气管扩张比肾上腺素能药物更多,持续时间更长。沙美特罗作用较慢,但作用时间较沙丁胺醇长。沙美特罗的起效慢于异丙阿托品,但沙美特罗的平均支气管扩张效果优于抗胆碱能药物,维持支气管扩张的时间比异丙阿托品更长(沙美特罗在4-12 h的时间内的反应显著(P<0.05)大于异丙阿托品,但在15 min至1 h的时间内,异丙阿托品的反应超过沙美特罗)。与异丙托溴铵和沙丁胺醇相比,沙美特罗的平均FEV、曲线下面积显著(P<0.05)增大。异丙托溴铵处理后的平均FEV、曲线下面积显著高于沙丁胺醇处理后(p < 0.05)。无论如何,我们的数据显示了患者反应的个体差异。我们得出结论,在临床推荐剂量下,沙美特罗对肺功能的影响优于异丙托溴铵,因为它的作用时间比异丙托溴铵更长。较长的给药间隔可能提高依从性,鼓励COPD患者服用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of the Larynx in Cough Central Nervous Mechanisms in Cough Sensory Mechanisms Inhalation Cough Challenge in the Investigation of the Cough Reflex and Antitussives Cough and Other Reflexes on Irritation of Airway Mucosa in Man
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1