Focus group methodology in the development of a survey to measure physician use of cancer staging systems.

The Canadian journal of oncology Pub Date : 1995-07-01
F D Ashbury, M Gospodarowicz, E Kaegi, B O'Sullivan
{"title":"Focus group methodology in the development of a survey to measure physician use of cancer staging systems.","authors":"F D Ashbury,&nbsp;M Gospodarowicz,&nbsp;E Kaegi,&nbsp;B O'Sullivan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate classification and staging of cancers enables physicians to select appropriate treatments, to evaluate outcomes of health management more reliably, to compare and interpret statistics reported from various institutions on a local, regional, national and international basis more consistently and to assist exchanges of information between different centers of treatment. This paper examines group interview methodology to develop the first-ever survey of Canadian cancer care specialists pertaining to staging systems. It is shown how the responses provided by participants contributed to the formulation of testable hypotheses and shaped the development of survey questions. As well, experiences are shared regarding the technical issues that arose using the focus group technique with physicians. In conclusion, there is a brief discussion of how the use of staging classification systems might be understood from the perspective of diffusion theory and social marketing (i.e., how information about cancer staging has been communicated and disseminated.</p>","PeriodicalId":79379,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of oncology","volume":"5 2","pages":"361-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate classification and staging of cancers enables physicians to select appropriate treatments, to evaluate outcomes of health management more reliably, to compare and interpret statistics reported from various institutions on a local, regional, national and international basis more consistently and to assist exchanges of information between different centers of treatment. This paper examines group interview methodology to develop the first-ever survey of Canadian cancer care specialists pertaining to staging systems. It is shown how the responses provided by participants contributed to the formulation of testable hypotheses and shaped the development of survey questions. As well, experiences are shared regarding the technical issues that arose using the focus group technique with physicians. In conclusion, there is a brief discussion of how the use of staging classification systems might be understood from the perspective of diffusion theory and social marketing (i.e., how information about cancer staging has been communicated and disseminated.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦点小组方法学在一项调查的发展,以衡量医生使用癌症分期系统。
癌症的准确分类和分期使医生能够选择适当的治疗方法,更可靠地评估健康管理的结果,更一致地比较和解释来自地方、区域、国家和国际各机构报告的统计数据,并协助不同治疗中心之间的信息交流。本文探讨了小组访谈方法,以开发加拿大癌症护理专家有关分期系统的首次调查。它显示了参与者提供的回答如何有助于制定可测试的假设和塑造调查问题的发展。此外,还分享了与医生使用焦点小组技术所产生的技术问题的经验。总之,简要讨论了如何从扩散理论和社会营销的角度来理解分期分类系统的使用(即,如何沟通和传播有关癌症分期的信息)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A study of waiting times and waiting lists for radiation therapy patients. Age-related prognostic factor analysis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Docetaxel: a review of its pharmacology and clinical activity. Age-related prognostic factor analysis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The role of palliative radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1