Blood cardioplegia does not increase haemolysis. A comparison between crystalloid and blood cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass grafting.

T T Rinne
{"title":"Blood cardioplegia does not increase haemolysis. A comparison between crystalloid and blood cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass grafting.","authors":"T T Rinne","doi":"10.3109/14017439609107244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To study the effect of cardioprotection type on haemolysis, 100 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were allocated to receive either blood cardioplegia (BCP) or crystalloid cardioplegia (CCP). Haemoglobin concentrations in plasma and urine were measured after induction of anaesthesia, 1 hour postoperatively and the next morning; blood acid-base status was determined at the end of cardiopulmonary perfusion; serum electrolytes and creatinine were measured before and 1 and 3 hours after the operation and serum creatinine also the next morning. Plasma haemoglobin values tended to be higher in the CCP than in the BCP group (47.6, 200.2 and 69.1 vs 31.5, 207.5 and 39.2 mg/l, p = 0.084). The urinary haemoglobin concentrations did not differ between the groups. The acid-base status showed greater buffer capacity with BCP technique. These results contradict association of blood cardioplegia technique with increased haemolysis during coronary artery bypass grafting.</p>","PeriodicalId":76527,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery","volume":"30 2","pages":"65-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/14017439609107244","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/14017439609107244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To study the effect of cardioprotection type on haemolysis, 100 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were allocated to receive either blood cardioplegia (BCP) or crystalloid cardioplegia (CCP). Haemoglobin concentrations in plasma and urine were measured after induction of anaesthesia, 1 hour postoperatively and the next morning; blood acid-base status was determined at the end of cardiopulmonary perfusion; serum electrolytes and creatinine were measured before and 1 and 3 hours after the operation and serum creatinine also the next morning. Plasma haemoglobin values tended to be higher in the CCP than in the BCP group (47.6, 200.2 and 69.1 vs 31.5, 207.5 and 39.2 mg/l, p = 0.084). The urinary haemoglobin concentrations did not differ between the groups. The acid-base status showed greater buffer capacity with BCP technique. These results contradict association of blood cardioplegia technique with increased haemolysis during coronary artery bypass grafting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液停搏不增加溶血。冠状动脉旁路移植术中晶体与血液停搏的比较。
为了研究心脏保护类型对溶血的影响,将100例计划择期行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者分为血液心脏截截术(BCP)和晶体心脏截截术(CCP)两组。麻醉诱导后、术后1小时及次日早晨测定血浆和尿液血红蛋白浓度;心肺灌注结束时测定血酸碱状态;术前、术后1、3 h测定血清电解质、肌酐,次日晨测定血清肌酐。CCP组血浆血红蛋白值高于BCP组(47.6、200.2和69.1 vs 31.5、207.5和39.2 mg/l, p = 0.084)。尿血红蛋白浓度在两组之间没有差异。BCP技术显示出更大的酸碱状态缓冲能力。这些结果与血液停搏技术与冠状动脉旁路移植术中溶血增加的关联相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationships between divisions of the lingular bronchus and vascularization patterns in the lingula. A new no-touch preparation technique. Technical notes. Delayed intrathoracic herniation of the stomach with pleural empyema due to diaphragmatic stab wound. Pleuroscopy: therapeutic applications. In vivo assessment of luminal cross-sectional areas and circumferential tension-strain relations of the porcine aorta.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1