Role of increased DNA replication in the carcinogenic risk of nonmutagenic chemical carcinogens

Michael L. Cunningham
{"title":"Role of increased DNA replication in the carcinogenic risk of nonmutagenic chemical carcinogens","authors":"Michael L. Cunningham","doi":"10.1016/S0165-1110(96)90012-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>DNA replication is not an error-free process; therefore induction of cell proliferation with the requisite increase in DNA replication may be an important mechanism by which carcinogenesis can be induced by chemicals.</p><p>Data presented in this overview indicate a positive association between increased cell proliferation and carcinogenesis, and illustrate the value of performing mechanistic studies such as cell proliferation assays in conjunction with short-term tests to further investigate the results of cancer bioassays. Whereas chemically-induced cell proliferation per se may not be sufficient to induce carcinogenesis, it creates a favorable environment for tumor development. There are two types of chemically-induced cell proliferation, mitogenic and cytotoxic, and they have different consequences regarding the mechanism of carcinogenesis of a chemical. Mitogenic chemical such as phenobarbital, oxazepam, and the peroxisome proliferating agents exert a short-term cell proliferative response that may exert its primary effect in carcinogenesis at the promotion stages. It is not clear at what stage(s) cytotoxic agents such as methapyrilene, <em>α</em><sub>2<em>u</em></sub>-globulin inducers or saccharin exert their effects in carcinogenesis. A confounding factor in evaluation of cell proliferation in risk assessments is the production of chemical specific pleiotropic effects that may contribute to the carcinogenicity of a chemical. It is clear that mechanistic studies performed to understand the relationship of sex, species and dose in rodent carcinogenicity assays of chemicals is critical for the extrapolation of such data for human health assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100940,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0165-1110(96)90012-3","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165111096900123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

DNA replication is not an error-free process; therefore induction of cell proliferation with the requisite increase in DNA replication may be an important mechanism by which carcinogenesis can be induced by chemicals.

Data presented in this overview indicate a positive association between increased cell proliferation and carcinogenesis, and illustrate the value of performing mechanistic studies such as cell proliferation assays in conjunction with short-term tests to further investigate the results of cancer bioassays. Whereas chemically-induced cell proliferation per se may not be sufficient to induce carcinogenesis, it creates a favorable environment for tumor development. There are two types of chemically-induced cell proliferation, mitogenic and cytotoxic, and they have different consequences regarding the mechanism of carcinogenesis of a chemical. Mitogenic chemical such as phenobarbital, oxazepam, and the peroxisome proliferating agents exert a short-term cell proliferative response that may exert its primary effect in carcinogenesis at the promotion stages. It is not clear at what stage(s) cytotoxic agents such as methapyrilene, α2u-globulin inducers or saccharin exert their effects in carcinogenesis. A confounding factor in evaluation of cell proliferation in risk assessments is the production of chemical specific pleiotropic effects that may contribute to the carcinogenicity of a chemical. It is clear that mechanistic studies performed to understand the relationship of sex, species and dose in rodent carcinogenicity assays of chemicals is critical for the extrapolation of such data for human health assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA复制增加在非诱变化学致癌物致癌性风险中的作用
DNA复制不是一个没有错误的过程;因此,诱导细胞增殖并增加必要的DNA复制可能是化学物质诱导致癌的重要机制。本综述中提供的数据表明,细胞增殖增加与癌变之间存在正相关关系,并说明进行机制研究的价值,如细胞增殖试验与短期试验相结合,以进一步研究癌症生物测定的结果。虽然化学诱导的细胞增殖本身可能不足以诱导癌变,但它为肿瘤的发展创造了有利的环境。化学物质诱导的细胞增殖有两种类型,有丝分裂和细胞毒性,它们对化学物质致癌的机制有不同的影响。有丝分裂化学物质如苯巴比妥、恶西泮和过氧化物酶体增殖剂发挥短期细胞增殖反应,可能在促进癌变阶段发挥其主要作用。目前尚不清楚细胞毒性药物如甲基嘧啶烯、α - u-球蛋白诱导剂或糖精在癌变中的作用是在哪个阶段发挥作用的。风险评估中评估细胞增殖的一个混淆因素是可能导致化学品致癌性的化学品特异性多效效应的产生。显然,为了解化学品啮齿动物致癌性分析中性别、物种和剂量之间的关系而进行的机制研究对于推断此类数据以进行人类健康评估至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DNA adducts and chronic degenerative diseases. Pathogenetic relevance and implications in preventive medicine Carbon tetrachloride: Genetic effects and other modes of action Dr. Hans F. Stich, Professor Emeritus of the University of British Columbia, 1927–1995 Product review Foreword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1