Internal mammary arteriography without selective cannulation using a new balloon occlusion catheter.

S R Berger, P B Kurnik, H L Waxman, W C Groh, W J Untereker, W H Matthai
{"title":"Internal mammary arteriography without selective cannulation using a new balloon occlusion catheter.","authors":"S R Berger,&nbsp;P B Kurnik,&nbsp;H L Waxman,&nbsp;W C Groh,&nbsp;W J Untereker,&nbsp;W H Matthai","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199610)39:2<198::AID-CCD20>3.0.CO;2-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.</p>","PeriodicalId":9664,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199610)39:2<198::AID-CCD20>3.0.CO;2-C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用新的球囊阻塞导管进行乳腺内动脉造影,无选择性插管。
乳腺内动脉(IMA)血管造影既困难又耗时。我们评估了一种定制设计的球囊尖端导管,一种伯曼导管(Arrow International, Reading, PA),通过创建端孔进行改进,允许导线通过中央管腔,无需选择性插管即可对IMA进行成像。我们比较了新导管与标准选择性导管技术的易用性、手术时间和图像质量。36例IMA移植患者被随机分配使用研究导管或标准导管进行影像学检查。记录图像质量,从差到优,到锁骨下动脉置管时间(time 1),到首次IMA血管造影时间(time 2),以及两者之间的差异(time 3)。TIME 3定义了在IMA部位找到和放置导管所需的时间。除一名患者外,所有患者的图像质量均为良好或极好。这一个病人,随机分配到标准的导管技术,有选择的导管图像质量差。然而,更换研究导管后,图像质量极佳。两种方法的TIME 1 (P = 0.57)和TIME 2 (P = 0.55)无差异。TIME 3有显著差异(P = 0.05),有利于研究导管。两种技术均无并发症,使用的总造影剂体积在两种技术之间无显著差异(P = 0.32)。我们的结论是,一种新的无需选择性插管的IMA成像导管技术安全、快速、易于使用,并且可能为难以进入乳腺内动脉的患者提供特别的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of basal epicardial tone on endothelium-independent coronary flow reserve measurement. Coronary stenting in the elderly: longitudinal results in a wide spectrum of patients treated with a new and more practical approach. Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study (DAIS): quantitative coronary angiographic analysis of coronary artery atherosclerosis. Determinants of rebound thrombin activity after cessation of heparin in patients undergoing coronary interventions. Percutaneous intervention: design, technique, and pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1