Clinical significance of complements in ascitic diseases: elevated complement levels disapproving the liver disease origin.

S S Wang, F Y Lee, Y Chao, C C Chen, H Y Lin, S L Wu, S D Lee
{"title":"Clinical significance of complements in ascitic diseases: elevated complement levels disapproving the liver disease origin.","authors":"S S Wang,&nbsp;F Y Lee,&nbsp;Y Chao,&nbsp;C C Chen,&nbsp;H Y Lin,&nbsp;S L Wu,&nbsp;S D Lee","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a two-year period, ascitic fluid concentrations of complement 3c and complement 4 were measured in 110 patients with sterile cirrhotic ascites, 31 patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, 65 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 36 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and 12 patients with miscellaneous diseases (nephrotic syndrome 4, systemic lupus erythematosus 3, secondary peritonitis 2, cardiac ascites 1, eosinophilic peritonitis 1 and tuberculosis peritonitis 1) to assess the clinical utility of ascitic fluid complements. The ascitic fluid level of complements 3c or C4 was significantly higher in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (32.8 +/- 10.2, 13.4 +/- 7.4 mg/dL) than in patients with sterile cirrhotic ascites (9.2 +/- 5.2, 4.5 +/- 3.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (8.2 +/- 4.1, 3.8 +/- 2.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001) or hepatocellular carcinoma (12.8 +/- 8.3, 5.6 +/- 4.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001). However, it was not significantly different from the miscellaneous disease group. To verify that ascites formation is not related to liver disease origin, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 83.3%, 92.7% and 90.9%, respectively, by the ascitic fluid level of complement 3c higher than the cut-off value (20 mg/dl); or 60.4%, 89.8% and 84.3%, respectively, by the ascitic fluid level of complement 4 higher than the cut-off value (10 mg/dL). A direct correlation was found between the ascitic fluid protein level and the ascitic fluid complement 3c (r = 0.70) or complement 4 (r = 0.57) level. Based on results in this study, we can conclude that measuring ascitic fluid complements is clinically useful in disapproving the liver disease origin of ascites formation. However, it is of little value in diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or hepatocellular carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20569,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life sciences","volume":"20 2","pages":"51-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China. Part B, Life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a two-year period, ascitic fluid concentrations of complement 3c and complement 4 were measured in 110 patients with sterile cirrhotic ascites, 31 patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, 65 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, 36 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis and 12 patients with miscellaneous diseases (nephrotic syndrome 4, systemic lupus erythematosus 3, secondary peritonitis 2, cardiac ascites 1, eosinophilic peritonitis 1 and tuberculosis peritonitis 1) to assess the clinical utility of ascitic fluid complements. The ascitic fluid level of complements 3c or C4 was significantly higher in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (32.8 +/- 10.2, 13.4 +/- 7.4 mg/dL) than in patients with sterile cirrhotic ascites (9.2 +/- 5.2, 4.5 +/- 3.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (8.2 +/- 4.1, 3.8 +/- 2.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001) or hepatocellular carcinoma (12.8 +/- 8.3, 5.6 +/- 4.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001). However, it was not significantly different from the miscellaneous disease group. To verify that ascites formation is not related to liver disease origin, diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 83.3%, 92.7% and 90.9%, respectively, by the ascitic fluid level of complement 3c higher than the cut-off value (20 mg/dl); or 60.4%, 89.8% and 84.3%, respectively, by the ascitic fluid level of complement 4 higher than the cut-off value (10 mg/dL). A direct correlation was found between the ascitic fluid protein level and the ascitic fluid complement 3c (r = 0.70) or complement 4 (r = 0.57) level. Based on results in this study, we can conclude that measuring ascitic fluid complements is clinically useful in disapproving the liver disease origin of ascites formation. However, it is of little value in diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or hepatocellular carcinoma.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补体在腹水疾病中的临床意义:补体水平升高不利于肝脏疾病的起源。
对110例无菌性肝硬化腹水患者、31例自发性细菌性腹膜炎患者、65例肝癌患者、36例腹膜癌患者和12例杂病患者(肾病综合征4例、系统性红斑狼疮3例、继发性腹膜炎2例、心源性腹水1例、原发性腹水1例)的腹水补体3c和补体4浓度进行了测定。嗜酸性腹膜炎1和结核性腹膜炎1)评估腹水补剂的临床应用。腹膜癌患者腹水补体3c或C4水平(32.8 +/- 10.2,13.4 +/- 7.4 mg/dL)明显高于无菌肝硬化腹水(9.2 +/- 5.2,4.5 +/- 3.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001)、自发性细菌性腹膜炎(8.2 +/- 4.1,3.8 +/- 2.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001)或肝细胞癌(12.8 +/- 8.3,5.6 +/- 4.4 mg/dL, p < 0.001)。但与杂病组无显著性差异。验证腹水形成与肝脏疾病起源无关,通过腹水补体水平高于临界值(20 mg/dl) 3c,诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为83.3%、92.7%和90.9%;补体4水平高于临界值(10 mg/dL),分别为60.4%、89.8%和84.3%。腹水蛋白水平与腹水补体3c (r = 0.70)或补体4 (r = 0.57)水平直接相关。根据本研究的结果,我们可以得出结论,测量腹水补体在临床上对判断腹水形成的肝脏疾病来源是有用的。但对自发性细菌性腹膜炎或肝细胞癌的诊断价值不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Iron and atherosclerosis. Cultivation of recombinant Escherichia coli to achieve high cell density with a high level of penicillin G acylase activity. Dynamic joint and muscle forces during knee isokinetic exercise. Temporal and spatial sequence expression of cytokeratin K19 in cultured human keratinocyte. An increase in free radical production by means of an anion channel blocker DIDS in mouse peritoneal neutrophils.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1