Autonomy versus forcing in the organization of human rhythmic forearm movements.

J Pailhous, M Bonnard, T Coyle
{"title":"Autonomy versus forcing in the organization of human rhythmic forearm movements.","authors":"J Pailhous,&nbsp;M Bonnard,&nbsp;T Coyle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In biological systems, obviously dissipative, some injection of muscle force is required in order to sustain rhythmic movement. As the movement frequency increases, the way the muscle-force-to-movement relationship evolves (in timing and amplitude) can be used to characterize some fundamental control properties, including whether the observed system is autonomous or forced. In the case of a simple rhythmic, biological movement (single-joint horizontal forearm movement), this question can be addressed by assuming that the processed electromyographic activity (EMG) is related to the muscle torques. In this case, 2 interesting phenomena can be observed as the frequency increases. The first is that the phase lag between the force and movement remains constant (40 degrees), and the second is that the co-contraction of the agonist and antagonist muscle groups increases with the square of the frequency. These results showed that the contribution of muscle forces to movement organization cannot be regarded in terms of an escapement in an autonomous system, nor in terms of a forcing function in a forced system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10555,"journal":{"name":"Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie","volume":"319 9","pages":"773-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In biological systems, obviously dissipative, some injection of muscle force is required in order to sustain rhythmic movement. As the movement frequency increases, the way the muscle-force-to-movement relationship evolves (in timing and amplitude) can be used to characterize some fundamental control properties, including whether the observed system is autonomous or forced. In the case of a simple rhythmic, biological movement (single-joint horizontal forearm movement), this question can be addressed by assuming that the processed electromyographic activity (EMG) is related to the muscle torques. In this case, 2 interesting phenomena can be observed as the frequency increases. The first is that the phase lag between the force and movement remains constant (40 degrees), and the second is that the co-contraction of the agonist and antagonist muscle groups increases with the square of the frequency. These results showed that the contribution of muscle forces to movement organization cannot be regarded in terms of an escapement in an autonomous system, nor in terms of a forcing function in a forced system.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类有节奏的前臂运动组织中的自主与强迫。
在明显耗散的生物系统中,为了维持有节奏的运动,需要一些肌肉力量的注入。随着运动频率的增加,肌肉-力量-运动关系的演变方式(在时间和振幅上)可以用来表征一些基本的控制特性,包括观察到的系统是自主的还是被迫的。在一个简单的有节奏的生物运动(单关节水平前臂运动)的情况下,这个问题可以通过假设处理的肌电活动(EMG)与肌肉扭矩有关来解决。在这种情况下,随着频率的增加,可以观察到两个有趣的现象。第一个是力和运动之间的相位滞后保持不变(40度),第二个是激动剂和拮抗剂肌群的共同收缩随频率的平方而增加。这些结果表明,肌肉力量对运动组织的贡献不能从自主系统中的擒纵角度来考虑,也不能从强制系统中的强制函数来考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working memory Goethe and the ABC model of flower development. COOH-terminal truncated human cardiac MyBP-C alters myosin filament organization. What to expect from MRI in the investigation of the central nervous system? Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vaccinology. Paris, France, 18-20 November 1998.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1