A model to assess the effectiveness of topical antipruritics.

R Drozdenko, S C Pennisi, W Minkin, H Spivak, S Weinstein, C Weinstein
{"title":"A model to assess the effectiveness of topical antipruritics.","authors":"R Drozdenko,&nbsp;S C Pennisi,&nbsp;W Minkin,&nbsp;H Spivak,&nbsp;S Weinstein,&nbsp;C Weinstein","doi":"10.1159/000211441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A model has been developed to determine the effectiveness of topical antipruritics. It utilizes controlled, experimentally induced itch and has demonstrated the effectiveness of the direct action on cutaneous receptor sites of a topical anesthetic, benzocaine, in a topical antipruritic formulation, and has been used to differentiate between two effective topical antipruritics. Three studies are presented: The first study examined the reliability of the experimentally induced itch. Several indices of reliability were computed from the data of this first study. Cronbach's alpha was 0.92. Winer's theta also was 0.92. Simple test-retest reliability, computed at intervals of 29 min, 1 day, and 6-7 days, resulted in Pearson correlations of 0.84, 0.73, and 0.60, respectively. In the second study, the model differentiated statistically between the itch relief resulting from the topical application of a formulation with 6% benzocaine and the same formulation without benzocaine. The third study examined 2 known topical antipruritics: one containing 6% benzocaine and the other 1% hydrocortisone. Both topical antipruritics were found to relieve itch; however, the benzocaine antipruritic produced statistically significantly greater itch relief in more subjects than the hydrocortisone antipruritic at both 1 and 30 min after application. These results demonstrate that OTC antipruritics can be differentiated for effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":21596,"journal":{"name":"Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society","volume":"9 5","pages":"334-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000211441","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin pharmacology : the official journal of the Skin Pharmacology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000211441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A model has been developed to determine the effectiveness of topical antipruritics. It utilizes controlled, experimentally induced itch and has demonstrated the effectiveness of the direct action on cutaneous receptor sites of a topical anesthetic, benzocaine, in a topical antipruritic formulation, and has been used to differentiate between two effective topical antipruritics. Three studies are presented: The first study examined the reliability of the experimentally induced itch. Several indices of reliability were computed from the data of this first study. Cronbach's alpha was 0.92. Winer's theta also was 0.92. Simple test-retest reliability, computed at intervals of 29 min, 1 day, and 6-7 days, resulted in Pearson correlations of 0.84, 0.73, and 0.60, respectively. In the second study, the model differentiated statistically between the itch relief resulting from the topical application of a formulation with 6% benzocaine and the same formulation without benzocaine. The third study examined 2 known topical antipruritics: one containing 6% benzocaine and the other 1% hydrocortisone. Both topical antipruritics were found to relieve itch; however, the benzocaine antipruritic produced statistically significantly greater itch relief in more subjects than the hydrocortisone antipruritic at both 1 and 30 min after application. These results demonstrate that OTC antipruritics can be differentiated for effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个评估局部止痒药有效性的模型。
已经建立了一个模型来确定局部止痒药的有效性。它利用可控的、实验诱导的瘙痒,并证明了局部麻醉剂苯佐卡因在局部止痒制剂中直接作用于皮肤受体部位的有效性,并已被用于区分两种有效的局部止痒药。本文介绍了三项研究:第一项研究考察了实验诱导的瘙痒的可靠性。根据第一次研究的数据计算了几个可靠度指标。Cronbach’s alpha为0.92。Winer的θ也是0.92。以29分钟、1天和6-7天为间隔计算的简单测试-重测信度的Pearson相关性分别为0.84、0.73和0.60。在第二项研究中,该模型在局部应用含有6%苯佐卡因的配方和不含苯佐卡因的相同配方所产生的瘙痒缓解之间进行了统计区分。第三项研究检查了两种已知的局部止痒药:一种含有6%的苯佐卡因,另一种含有1%的氢化可的松。两种局部止痒药均能缓解瘙痒;然而,在应用后1和30分钟,苯佐卡因止痒剂比氢化可的松止痒剂对更多受试者的瘙痒缓解有统计学意义上的显著性。这些结果表明,OTC止痒药的有效性是可以区分的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pro-inflammatory cytokine cascade in human plucked hair. Immunological gene therapy approaches for malignant melanoma. 1. Tumor-immunological background. A skin equivalent model for cosmetological trials: an in vitro efficacy study of a new biopeptide. Bisindolylmaleimide protein-kinase-C inhibitors delay the decline in DNA synthesis in mouse hair follicle organ cultures. Cyclosporin G inhibits proliferation of A431 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner comparable to cyclosporin A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1