A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.

IF 5.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Psychological review Pub Date : 1997-01-01 DOI:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3
D E Meyer, D E Kieras
{"title":"A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.","authors":"D E Meyer, D E Kieras","doi":"10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new theoretical framework, executive-process interactive control (EPIC), is introduced for characterizing human performance of concurrent perceptual-motor and cognitive tasks. On the basis of EPIC, computational models may be formulated to simulate multiple-task performance under a variety of circumstances. These models account well for reaction-time data from representative situations such as the psychological refractory-period procedure. EPIC's goodness of fit supports several key conclusions: (a) At a cognitive level, people can apply distinct sets of production rules simultaneously for executing the procedures of multiple tasks; (b) people's capacity to process information at \"peripheral\" perceptual-motor levels is limited; (c) to cope with such limits and to satisfy task priorities, flexible scheduling strategies are used; and (d) these strategies are mediated by executive cognitive processes that coordinate concurrent tasks adaptively.","PeriodicalId":21016,"journal":{"name":"Psychological review","volume":"104 1","pages":"3-65"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3","citationCount":"1406","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1406

Abstract

A new theoretical framework, executive-process interactive control (EPIC), is introduced for characterizing human performance of concurrent perceptual-motor and cognitive tasks. On the basis of EPIC, computational models may be formulated to simulate multiple-task performance under a variety of circumstances. These models account well for reaction-time data from representative situations such as the psychological refractory-period procedure. EPIC's goodness of fit supports several key conclusions: (a) At a cognitive level, people can apply distinct sets of production rules simultaneously for executing the procedures of multiple tasks; (b) people's capacity to process information at "peripheral" perceptual-motor levels is limited; (c) to cope with such limits and to satisfy task priorities, flexible scheduling strategies are used; and (d) these strategies are mediated by executive cognitive processes that coordinate concurrent tasks adaptively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执行认知过程和多任务表现的计算理论:第1部分。基本机制。
一个新的理论框架,执行-过程交互控制(EPIC),被引入表征人类并发的感知-运动和认知任务的表现。在EPIC的基础上,可以制定计算模型来模拟各种情况下的多任务性能。这些模型很好地解释了来自代表性情况的反应时间数据,如心理不应期手术。EPIC的拟合优度支持了几个关键结论:(a)在认知层面,人们可以同时应用不同的生产规则集来执行多个任务的程序;(b)人们在“外围”感知运动层面处理信息的能力有限;(c)为了应付这种限制和满足任务优先次序,采用灵活的调度策略;(d)这些策略受执行认知过程的调节,执行认知过程自适应地协调并发任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological review
Psychological review 医学-心理学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychological Review publishes articles that make important theoretical contributions to any area of scientific psychology, including systematic evaluation of alternative theories.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive and neural mechanisms of linguistic influence on perception. Differences in learning across the lifespan emerge via resource-rational computations. True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Integrating fuzzy-trace theory and computational memory modeling. Statistical learning subserves a higher purpose: Novelty detection in an information foraging system. Rethinking memory impairments: Retrieval failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1