A study to investigate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat-core and atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

T S Murray
{"title":"A study to investigate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat-core and atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.","authors":"T S Murray","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat-core (nisoldipine CC 10, 20, 40 mg) and atenolol (50, 100 mg) were compared in 230 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Treatment was titrated at two-weekly intervals as necessary to control blood pressure. After eight weeks of active therapy, the two treatments proved to be equally effective in reducing sitting diastolic blood pressure (13.7 +/- 8.3 mmHg and 14.2 +/- 9.1 mmHg for nisoldipine CC and atenolol, respectively), and provided equivalent reduction in systolic blood pressure and identical response rates (69%). Heart rate was reduced from baseline in the atenolol group but remained unchanged in the nisoldipine CC group (p < 0.001 difference between the two groups). Both nisoldipine CC and atenolol were well tolerated and had no detectable metabolic effects. Adverse events were minor and of the type commonly associated with drugs of these classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"50 7","pages":"368-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat-core (nisoldipine CC 10, 20, 40 mg) and atenolol (50, 100 mg) were compared in 230 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Treatment was titrated at two-weekly intervals as necessary to control blood pressure. After eight weeks of active therapy, the two treatments proved to be equally effective in reducing sitting diastolic blood pressure (13.7 +/- 8.3 mmHg and 14.2 +/- 9.1 mmHg for nisoldipine CC and atenolol, respectively), and provided equivalent reduction in systolic blood pressure and identical response rates (69%). Heart rate was reduced from baseline in the atenolol group but remained unchanged in the nisoldipine CC group (p < 0.001 difference between the two groups). Both nisoldipine CC and atenolol were well tolerated and had no detectable metabolic effects. Adverse events were minor and of the type commonly associated with drugs of these classes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼索地平包芯与阿替洛尔治疗轻中度高血压的疗效和耐受性比较研究。
在230例轻中度原发性高血压患者中,比较尼索地平包芯(尼索地平CC 10、20、40 mg)和阿替洛尔(50、100 mg)的疗效和耐受性。治疗每两周滴定一次,以控制血压。经过8周的积极治疗,两种治疗方法在降低坐位舒张压方面同样有效(尼索地平CC和阿替洛尔分别为13.7 +/- 8.3 mmHg和14.2 +/- 9.1 mmHg),并提供相同的收缩压降低和相同的缓解率(69%)。阿替洛尔组心率较基线有所降低,但尼索地平CC组保持不变(两组差异p < 0.001)。尼索地平CC和阿替洛尔耐受性良好,没有可检测到的代谢影响。不良事件是轻微的,通常与这类药物相关的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CANCER PREVENTION. COLIC. Diabetes mellitus. Renal artery stenosis. Tirofiban--spinning the data from fact to hype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1