How do general practitioners manage patients at risk from stroke?

G E Mead, H Murray, C N McCollum, P A O'Neill
{"title":"How do general practitioners manage patients at risk from stroke?","authors":"G E Mead,&nbsp;H Murray,&nbsp;C N McCollum,&nbsp;P A O'Neill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study assessed by means of a postal questionnaire how general practitioners (GPs) manage patients at risk from stroke. Of the 640 GPs sent a questionnaire, 294 (46%) replied. In patients with a recent transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, 24% of responding GPs would not arrange any investigations. Sixty-one per cent refer under half of their patients for further investigation, although 99% of GPs would commence aspirin. Seventy-seven per cent of GPs were aware of the benefits of carotid surgery. For patients in atrial fibrillation, most GPs (77%) thought that warfarin reduced stroke rates, but only 20% would consider commencing warfarin, although 26% would commence aspirin. In hypertensive patients, the GPs' threshold for treatment ranged from 135 to 200mmHg systolic (median 160mmHg), and from 90 to 110mmHg diastolic (median 100mmHg). Most GPs (84%) would treat isolated systolic hypertension with a median threshold of 180mmHg (range 140-240mmHg). The results of this study suggest that some patients at risk from stroke may not receive optimal investigation and treatment in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":22312,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of clinical practice","volume":"50 8","pages":"426-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed by means of a postal questionnaire how general practitioners (GPs) manage patients at risk from stroke. Of the 640 GPs sent a questionnaire, 294 (46%) replied. In patients with a recent transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke, 24% of responding GPs would not arrange any investigations. Sixty-one per cent refer under half of their patients for further investigation, although 99% of GPs would commence aspirin. Seventy-seven per cent of GPs were aware of the benefits of carotid surgery. For patients in atrial fibrillation, most GPs (77%) thought that warfarin reduced stroke rates, but only 20% would consider commencing warfarin, although 26% would commence aspirin. In hypertensive patients, the GPs' threshold for treatment ranged from 135 to 200mmHg systolic (median 160mmHg), and from 90 to 110mmHg diastolic (median 100mmHg). Most GPs (84%) would treat isolated systolic hypertension with a median threshold of 180mmHg (range 140-240mmHg). The results of this study suggest that some patients at risk from stroke may not receive optimal investigation and treatment in the community.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生如何管理有中风风险的病人?
本研究通过邮寄问卷的方式评估全科医生(全科医生)如何管理有中风风险的病人。在640名全科医生中,有294名(46%)回复了问卷。在近期发生过短暂性缺血发作或轻度缺血性卒中的患者中,24%的受访全科医生不安排任何检查。尽管99%的全科医生会开始服用阿司匹林,但61%的人会将不到一半的病人转介给进一步的调查。77%的全科医生知道颈动脉手术的好处。对于房颤患者,大多数全科医生(77%)认为华法林可以降低卒中发生率,但只有20%的人会考虑开始使用华法林,而26%的人会开始使用阿司匹林。在高血压患者中,全科医生的治疗阈值范围为135 - 200mmHg收缩压(中位数160mmHg)和90 - 110mmHg舒张压(中位数100mmHg)。大多数全科医生(84%)会治疗孤立性收缩期高血压,中位阈值为180mmHg(范围140-240mmHg)。这项研究的结果表明,一些有中风风险的患者可能没有在社区得到最佳的调查和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CANCER PREVENTION. COLIC. Diabetes mellitus. Renal artery stenosis. Tirofiban--spinning the data from fact to hype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1