Vasoactive effects of basic and acidic fibroblast growth factors in hamster cheek pouch arterioles.

M D Brown, O Hudlická, D Damon, B R Duling
{"title":"Vasoactive effects of basic and acidic fibroblast growth factors in hamster cheek pouch arterioles.","authors":"M D Brown,&nbsp;O Hudlická,&nbsp;D Damon,&nbsp;B R Duling","doi":"10.1159/000179190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fibroblasts growth factors (FGFs) exhibit well-known angiogenic actions, but there is some controversy about whether they have vasoactive effects on blood vessels which might contribute to angiogenesis per se. To clarify this, changes in arteriolar diameter were recorded during observation by videomicroscopy of 3rd- and 4th (terminal)-order arterioles (resting diameters 22.5 +/- 0.5 microns and 14.4 +/- 0.3 microns, respectively) in the hamster cheek pouch in response to FGF application. Recombinant human bFGF (basic) and aFGF (acidic) were applied from micropipettes positioned 5-10 microns from the adventitial surface of vessels. Maximum vasodilator effects of adenosine (10(-4) M) applied in a similar way were also observed. Adenosine increased the diameters of 4th-order arterioles by 37.2 +/- 3.8% and those of 3rd-order arterioles by 38.7 +/- 2.7. bFGF produced vasodilatation (threshold dose 0.1 ng ml-1) in both classes of arterioles, while aFGF produced dose-dependent constriction (threshold dose 0.01 ng ml-1). A maximal dilator effect in 4th-order arterioles was obtained with 100 ng ml-1 bFGF, when diameters reached 82.6 +/- 2.4% of those with adenosine. Maximal constrictor effect (-48.2 +/- 5.6% of resting diameter) occurred with a dose of 100 ng ml-1 aFGF. Vehicle alone (MOPS or bicarbonate buffer used as solvents for FGFs) had no effect. As vasoconstrictors are known to stimulate growth of smooth muscle cells while dilators stimulate growth of endothelial cells, it is possible that the opposing vasoactivities demonstrated for aFGF and bFGF are linked with their selective mitogenicity for smooth muscle and endothelial cells, respectively, and contribute to their angiogenic actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14035,"journal":{"name":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","volume":"16 6","pages":"308-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000179190","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of microcirculation, clinical and experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000179190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Fibroblasts growth factors (FGFs) exhibit well-known angiogenic actions, but there is some controversy about whether they have vasoactive effects on blood vessels which might contribute to angiogenesis per se. To clarify this, changes in arteriolar diameter were recorded during observation by videomicroscopy of 3rd- and 4th (terminal)-order arterioles (resting diameters 22.5 +/- 0.5 microns and 14.4 +/- 0.3 microns, respectively) in the hamster cheek pouch in response to FGF application. Recombinant human bFGF (basic) and aFGF (acidic) were applied from micropipettes positioned 5-10 microns from the adventitial surface of vessels. Maximum vasodilator effects of adenosine (10(-4) M) applied in a similar way were also observed. Adenosine increased the diameters of 4th-order arterioles by 37.2 +/- 3.8% and those of 3rd-order arterioles by 38.7 +/- 2.7. bFGF produced vasodilatation (threshold dose 0.1 ng ml-1) in both classes of arterioles, while aFGF produced dose-dependent constriction (threshold dose 0.01 ng ml-1). A maximal dilator effect in 4th-order arterioles was obtained with 100 ng ml-1 bFGF, when diameters reached 82.6 +/- 2.4% of those with adenosine. Maximal constrictor effect (-48.2 +/- 5.6% of resting diameter) occurred with a dose of 100 ng ml-1 aFGF. Vehicle alone (MOPS or bicarbonate buffer used as solvents for FGFs) had no effect. As vasoconstrictors are known to stimulate growth of smooth muscle cells while dilators stimulate growth of endothelial cells, it is possible that the opposing vasoactivities demonstrated for aFGF and bFGF are linked with their selective mitogenicity for smooth muscle and endothelial cells, respectively, and contribute to their angiogenic actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碱性和酸性成纤维细胞生长因子对仓鼠颊袋小动脉血管活性的影响。
成纤维细胞生长因子(FGFs)表现出众所周知的血管生成作用,但关于它们是否对血管具有血管活性作用,这可能有助于血管生成本身存在一些争议。为了澄清这一点,我们通过视频显微镜观察了FGF应用后仓鼠颊袋中第3级和第4级(末端)小动脉(静息直径分别为22.5 +/- 0.5微米和14.4 +/- 0.3微米)的小动脉直径变化。重组人bFGF(碱性)和aFGF(酸性)从距离血管外表面5-10微米的微移液管中注入。以类似方式应用的腺苷(10(-4)M)的最大血管扩张效应也被观察到。腺苷使四阶小动脉直径增加37.2 +/- 3.8%,使三阶小动脉直径增加38.7 +/- 2.7%。bFGF在两类小动脉中均产生血管扩张(阈值剂量为0.1 ng ml-1),而aFGF产生剂量依赖性收缩(阈值剂量为0.01 ng ml-1)。100 ng ml-1 bFGF对4级小动脉的扩张作用最大,直径为腺苷组的82.6±2.4%。当aFGF剂量为100 ng ml-1时,收缩作用最大(-48.2 +/- 5.6%的静息直径)。单独的载体(MOPS或碳酸氢盐缓冲液用作fgf的溶剂)没有效果。由于已知血管收缩剂刺激平滑肌细胞生长,而扩张剂刺激内皮细胞生长,因此aFGF和bFGF所表现出的相反的血管活性可能分别与它们对平滑肌和内皮细胞的选择性有丝分裂性有关,并有助于它们的血管生成作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measurement of blood perfusion in the dental pulp with laser Doppler flowmetry. Vascular smooth muscle, a multiply feedback-coupled system of high versatility, modulation and cell-signaling variability. Long-term registration of cutaneous microcirculation during general anesthesia. Synergetic interpretation of patterned vasomotor activity in microvascular perfusion: discrete effects of myogenic and neurogenic vasoconstriction as well as arterial and venous pressure fluctuations. Cardiovascular monitoring of elective aortic aneurysm repair using methods of chaos analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1