Sexual abuse in the health professions--who's counting?

M McPhedran
{"title":"Sexual abuse in the health professions--who's counting?","authors":"M McPhedran","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an examination of the health security of women, sexual exploitation of women patients when the perpetrators hold the trusted position of care provider, merits some considerable attention. Availability of data varies, with the majority gathered in the United States and Canada, focusing on medicine, psychotherapy and nursing. However, even for those professions, this field of research is in its early stages. Within the past few years, research has been undertaken in Australia and New Zealand, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Central to any discussion of this aspect of women's access to safe and appropriate health care are 3 questions about data. Do we know whether women are the principal victims of this abuse? Do such numbers count? Do we in fact need more data collection as we learn to respond more effectively to this particular form of violence against women? The author, who chaired Canada's first inquiry into the sexual abuse of patients by doctors, answers all 3 questions in the affirmative, with an emphasis on combining data collection with action. The sampling of research in this article demonstrates the need to combine qualitative and quantitative data to gain a more accurate understanding of the dynamics of abuse, within the social context of women's experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":76824,"journal":{"name":"World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales","volume":"49 2","pages":"154-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World health statistics quarterly. Rapport trimestriel de statistiques sanitaires mondiales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an examination of the health security of women, sexual exploitation of women patients when the perpetrators hold the trusted position of care provider, merits some considerable attention. Availability of data varies, with the majority gathered in the United States and Canada, focusing on medicine, psychotherapy and nursing. However, even for those professions, this field of research is in its early stages. Within the past few years, research has been undertaken in Australia and New Zealand, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and the United Kingdom. Central to any discussion of this aspect of women's access to safe and appropriate health care are 3 questions about data. Do we know whether women are the principal victims of this abuse? Do such numbers count? Do we in fact need more data collection as we learn to respond more effectively to this particular form of violence against women? The author, who chaired Canada's first inquiry into the sexual abuse of patients by doctors, answers all 3 questions in the affirmative, with an emphasis on combining data collection with action. The sampling of research in this article demonstrates the need to combine qualitative and quantitative data to gain a more accurate understanding of the dynamics of abuse, within the social context of women's experience.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗行业的性虐待——谁在数?
在对妇女健康安全的审查中,当施暴者担任可信赖的护理提供者时,对女病人进行性剥削的问题值得引起相当大的注意。数据的可用性各不相同,大多数数据收集于美国和加拿大,主要集中在医学、心理治疗和护理方面。然而,即使对这些专业来说,这一领域的研究也处于早期阶段。在过去几年中,在澳大利亚和新西兰、德国、荷兰、挪威和联合王国进行了研究。关于妇女获得安全和适当保健这方面的任何讨论的核心是关于数据的三个问题。我们知道妇女是否是这种虐待的主要受害者吗?这些数字算数吗?当我们学会更有效地应对这种针对妇女的特殊形式的暴力时,我们真的需要更多的数据收集吗?提交人主持了加拿大第一次对医生性虐待患者的调查,他肯定地回答了所有三个问题,并强调将数据收集与行动相结合。本文中的研究抽样表明,需要将定性和定量数据结合起来,以便在妇女经历的社会背景下更准确地了解虐待的动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Targets for health for all in the 21st century. Partnerships for health in the 21st century. Intersectoral action for health: a cornerstone for health for all in the 21st century. Develop and strengthen public health law. Reflections on health in development and human rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1