The role of midazolam-induced sedation in bone marrow aspiration/trephine biopsies.

Clinical and laboratory haematology Pub Date : 1996-12-01
C J Mainwaring, C Wong, R J Lush, J G Smith, C R Singer
{"title":"The role of midazolam-induced sedation in bone marrow aspiration/trephine biopsies.","authors":"C J Mainwaring,&nbsp;C Wong,&nbsp;R J Lush,&nbsp;J G Smith,&nbsp;C R Singer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was undertaken in 102 adult patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) midazolam in the setting of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy (BMAT). Combined local anaesthetic (LA) and sedation was used in 87% of patients and 13% received LA alone. Amnesia occurred in all sedated patients with only 9% experiencing a mild degree of post-procedure pain. This contrasted sharply with the non-sedated group, in whom 85% had intense pain during the biopsy followed by protracted local discomfort in approximately 54%. Drowsiness and some psychomotor impairment were the only notable sedation-related side-effects in approximately 20%. None required assisted ventilation. There was a resounding patient preference for BMAT with sedation. Considering the ease of use, safety and efficacy of i.v. midazolam, the availability of flumazenil as a reversal agent and the undoubted positive effects on quality of life, we would advocate using it in BMAT provided that there were no contraindications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10285,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","volume":"18 4","pages":"285-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and laboratory haematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was undertaken in 102 adult patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) midazolam in the setting of bone marrow aspiration and trephine biopsy (BMAT). Combined local anaesthetic (LA) and sedation was used in 87% of patients and 13% received LA alone. Amnesia occurred in all sedated patients with only 9% experiencing a mild degree of post-procedure pain. This contrasted sharply with the non-sedated group, in whom 85% had intense pain during the biopsy followed by protracted local discomfort in approximately 54%. Drowsiness and some psychomotor impairment were the only notable sedation-related side-effects in approximately 20%. None required assisted ventilation. There was a resounding patient preference for BMAT with sedation. Considering the ease of use, safety and efficacy of i.v. midazolam, the availability of flumazenil as a reversal agent and the undoubted positive effects on quality of life, we would advocate using it in BMAT provided that there were no contraindications.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咪达唑仑诱导的镇静在骨髓穿刺/环钻活检中的作用。
本研究对102例成人患者进行了研究,以评估骨髓穿刺和骨髓穿刺活检(BMAT)中静脉注射咪达唑仑的安全性和有效性。87%的患者使用局部麻醉和镇静,13%的患者单独使用局部麻醉。所有服用镇静剂的患者都出现了健忘症,只有9%的患者经历了轻度的术后疼痛。这与非镇静组形成鲜明对比,其中85%的人在活检期间有剧烈疼痛,大约54%的人有持续的局部不适。在大约20%的患者中,嗜睡和一些精神运动障碍是唯一显著的与镇静相关的副作用。不需要辅助通风。患者明显倾向于BMAT加镇静。考虑到静脉注射咪达唑仑的易用性、安全性和有效性,氟马西尼作为逆转剂的可获得性以及对生活质量无疑的积极影响,我们建议在没有禁忌症的情况下在BMAT中使用咪达唑仑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to Cavill Reference values for the activated partial thromboplastin time in infants using a synthetic reagent. A case of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome with hypersegmented and hypogranular eosinophils. Reference intervals for haematological parameters in urban school children and adolescents. Atlas of Blood Cell Differentiation (Interactive CD‐ROM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1